Advertisement

Better Place Video Showing EV Battery-Pack Quick Swap: We're Not Convinced

 
Follow John

Better Place battery-swap demonstration

Better Place battery-swap demonstration

Enlarge Photo

Today, the venture-funded Better Place consortium released a video showing one component of their project: a two-minute automated swap of the battery pack in an electric car, in this case a Nissan Rogue.

It's a nice video, and it's all over the interwebs. Green-car sites, tech geeks, EV fans, everyone's posting about Better Place.


We just felt we should add a few words of perspective and some background on the notion of "hot-swapping" battery packs.

We've talked to several auto engineers over the years. To a man, they are highly, highly skeptical that Better Place and its auto partner (Renault) can design and engineer a car that allows the pack to be removed and replaced in such a short time.

Why is hot-swapping so challenging?

First, the pack must be a core element of the vehicle's platform that contributes basic rigidity. The "T-Pack" battery of the 2011 Chevrolet Volt, for example, provides much of the strength down the vehicle's spine, where a transmission tunnel would be. That pack appears to be bolted to the frame in dozens of places.

Removing and replacing a 500-pound battery pack in two minutes might be roughly similar to removing and replacing a car's roof and doors in the same amount of time. Or perhaps doing the same with its engine and transmission, though those have far more wires, hoses, and connectors than the pack does.

Second, the vehicle has to last 10 or more years, which could mean as many as 1,000 swaps for a high-mileage vehicle. That requires engineering new types of mountings, fasteners, seals, and connectors that have never been built.

The engineers we spoke to questioned whether it was possible to design a safe, high-voltage connector durable to be inserted and removed that often. Keep in mind that any auto component must withstand the pounding, vibrations, dirt, mud, water, and general abuse ladled out to a car's chassis and structure over hundreds of thousands of miles and up to 20 years.

Third, the video appears to show the pack dropping out of the bottom of a small crossover vehicle.  Such a pack is likely to be 6 inches thick or more, even accounting for the laminated cells used by Automotive Energy Supply Corp., the lithium-cell company controlled by the Nissan-Renault alliance.

That's not a deal-breaker, but it imposes significant design constraints. The car is likely to be quite tall, to accommodate not only the occupants and the thickness of the battery pack, but a false floor on top of the battery to keep the car rigid even with the pack gone.

Standardized packs? NOT gonna happen

Finally, Better Place has spoken often of its desire to standardize packs to give consumers a choice of vehicles. Right now, Renault is the only company designing cars with removable packs.

Frankly, that ain't gonna happen. Every automaker considers its pack technology to be a core competence, similar to engine design. Given how tightly packs are integrated into vehicle design, few makers are going to use a pack designed by someone else.  Lithium cells, yes, but not the packs and control electronics that make hundreds of cells work together.

BP will likely launch in Israel with only a single vehicle available. We suspect that not every Israeli will want to drive an identical car, let alone actually needing different vehicle types for different uses. And remember, one-car families are much more the norm in Europe and Asia, so this car may be a family's only option.

Please, don't get us wrong; we applaud innovation in the auto industry. And we do actually hope that Better Place gets its very, very ambitious program up and running. Frankly, the automotive world could use some paradigms shifted.

We're just not ready to conclude, on the basis of one public-relations video, that Better Place is going to succeed at battery swaps.

As they say, stay tuned for more.





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (4)
  1. I am professional engineer, electrical/mechanical.
    First, a pack the size of the one shown in the BP video does not have to provide mechanic rigidity for the vehicle. That’s simply wrong. The existing chassis structure is adequate, and cross members can be elevated to U bars without ill effect. The pack design may be part of the structural package, but it need not be. If the pack grows large enough, it will need to maintain its own rigidity to prevent fatigue from vibration, but that is another issue. If you want more hands on advice for this kind of thing, ask around at any after market or customized chassis shop. You’ll find these kind of modifications common place – they have tension with the vertically integrated car OEMs who have an interest in nay saying anything they can’t control or charge a royalty on. There are also plenty of other similar mechanical cases with even heavier loads: bomb bays in bomber aircraft for example, also transport aircraft and ships come to mind. BP actually chose those retractable pack clamps in the demo from a bomb bay design.
    more...
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Second, regarding service life for mountings, fasteners, etc.: It’s largely been done! Good grief, think car door! A car door will see not 1,000 but maybe 100,000 make/break mechanical _and_ electrical cycles while withstanding ‘pounding, vibrations, dirt, mud, water’ _plus_ human abuse, all while sealing water tight. You’ll also note that the average car door makes an opening in the vehicle structure body about the size of a pack, without provoking car magazine articles about doors entitled “we’re not convinced”. Granted designing a good long lasting, crash resistant, car door requires some know how, as will this pack exchanger, but what are you folks on about when saying all the pieces have “never been built.”? The electrical high voltage power connector will also be a challenge, but as it need not be hot in the make/break as do some connectors, so alignment is the major issue, but solvable.
    Third, pack depth. Indeed 6 inches sounds about right for the _average_ depth, but the pack depth need not be uniform. It can take advantage of various clearances into the vehicle interior to grow, and then shrink to 3-4 inches under floor panels. Another look at the pack in the video shows that something like this is already going on for the BP design, even for that crossover vehicle.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. Finally, battery _packs_ need not standardize completely, what’s needed is a standard pack _interface_ to the exchange station mechanism – that’s much less of a problem. Regarding storing various pack designs, if one looks at the queue time / charge time in the back room, there’s just not that many batteries that need be stored at a station. Last, these packs will not be the first critical vehicle component to be standardized in the auto industry. Think hub – tire interface, and a whole world full of third party tire manufactures.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. 4 years after this article, i swap battaries when i want to.No single failure , 5 minutes of quiet quality time in my car and battarie is full again 100%.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2013 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.