Advertisement

How Often Can Stop-Start Systems Restart An Engine? More Than 1 Million Times

Follow Antony

Controlled Power Technologies' stop-start system

Controlled Power Technologies' stop-start system

Enlarge Photo

Visit any European city, and you'll be struck by an unfamiliar sound: That of engines, previously silent, re-starting on every green light.

A large number of cars in Europe now feature stop-start technology as standard, and while EPA mileage figures aren't favorable to its effects, they're starting to appear in the U.S. too.

People do have concerns over just how many restarts the systems can handle, but one firm is now guaranteeing its systems for 1.2 million restarts.

UK-based Controlled Power Technologies, or CPT, says its SpeedStart belt-integrated starter-generator system has seen two years of development and is confident it can handle 1.2 million stop-start cycles, the highest in the industry.

The systems handled as many as 7,200 restarts every day over the course of a year, with engine-off periods lasting between 5 and 25 seconds.

With that sort of longevity, the case for stop-start becomes much stronger.

More durable than regular starters?

Not that it isn't with current systems--which can comfortably handle between 150,000 to 300,000 stop-starts, mandated by OEMs.

By comparison, the humble starter motor is typically good for around 30,000 cycles. The extra longevity of start-stop systems is thanks to heavier-duty components, specifically designed to stop and restart thousands of times--in the knowledge that such systems will work dozens of times a journey, in many cases.

The high mileages modern vehicles are designed for mean components such as starter systems must last longer as well. CPT says modern cars can easily see 250,000 miles in 15 years nowadays, and future technologies may see them worked even harder.

One of these CPT expects to see is engine-off coasting--stopping at highway speeds under zero load--in regular, non-hybrid vehicles. In such scenarios, an engine may stop and restart hundreds of times in a journey, and a fast re-start is vital to ensure a driver can accelerate at any time.

Product group manager Peter Scanes said of CPT's system, "We needed therefore to demonstrate as convincingly as possible the near-zero probability of failure during the lifespan of a vehicle as well as the ability to achieve the maximum number of re-starts.

Controlled Power Technologies' stop-start system

Controlled Power Technologies' stop-start system

Enlarge Photo

"One of the most cost effective solutions for low fuel consumption is simply stopping the engine at every single opportunity – even if it’s only for a few seconds every stop counts" he adds.

Impressively, CPT also says its systems are effectively 100 percent recyclable at end-of-life--with only steel, copper, aluminum, some plastics and silicon used in their construction.

Several carmakers are already interested in the technology, and the company says the first vehicles with its system will appear by 2015.

Stop-start may not show benefits on the EPA's window stickers, but in heavy traffic--and now, over the course of a car's life--they're the more durable, gas-saving option.

_______________________________________________________

Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Google+

Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (2)
  1. It isn't that big of a deal.

    The reason that typical starter won't last long b/c they overstress the part and it is designed to over work for short few seconds. But if you increase the derating of the starter and it will be more than enough to outlast the engine. The question is really cost.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. I am puzzled at the statement that this feature is not indicated to be favorable in EPA testing. Shall we put aside EPA testing which is for shopping comparison only? How about a real world comparison by Consumer Reports, Popular Mechanics, even this e-periodical, as to two similar models one with the Stop/Start and one without? My hybrid has stop/start that I can cancel by defeating the ECON feature. I have made such an evaluation and my results, unofficial and not using specific control factors, is that with the ECON switch engaged the vehicle averages 30 MPG. Without the ECON, the vehicle averages 26 MPG. For ten gallons that would be 40 miles LESS travelled. That is significant.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!
Advertisement

Advertisement

 
© 2014 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by izmo, Inc.