Ford Energi Plug-In Hybrids Let You Choose Your...
Can Plug-In Electric Road Trips Revitalize...
Build Your Own Ford Transit Connect Electric...
Toyota's Kid-Friendly Electric Concept Stars At...
Bosch Offers Wireless Charging For Nissan Leaf...
Nobody particularly likes taxes, but as they go, gas tax is at least generally fair in how it's applied. The more gas you use, the more you pay. Use less, or none at all, and you pay less--or nothing.
Virginia residents will soon be paying nothing even if they drive gas guzzlers, as Governor Bob McDonnell has proposed dropping the state's gasoline tax, the revenues from which he describes as becoming "stagnant".
The extra revenue must come from somewhere though, so the proposal includes an increase in sales tax of 0.8 cents on the dollar, a $15 registration fee for every new car--and a $100 annual fee for plug-in and hybrid cars (similar to that of Washington state, but penalizing hybrids too), to make up for all that gas tax nobody else will be paying.
McDonnell himself says in the Washington Post that it all hinges on the state's low gas tax, which has remained 17.5 cents per gallon since 1986.
This wasn't indexed for inflation, meaning--in 1986 dollars--it's now worth about 8 cents on the gallon--and not making the state enough money.
Rather than raise tax in line with inflation, McDonnell wants to scrap it entirely, levying fees in other areas to cover the deficit.
While he argues that an increase in sales tax ultimately benefits the transport of everyone--those who use public transport, as well as private vehicles, for example--it's hard not to see the glaring flaw: Owners of gas-guzzlers will pay a lot less to run their vehicles, while those who've deliberately chosen more efficient plug-in and hybrid cars, will instantly pay $100 per year regardless of how much gas they use.
91,000 plug-in and hybrid cars would be affected--and potentially, the sales of many others.
Incidentally, the 17.5 cents per gallon tax will remain on diesel--to maintain revenue from commercial vehicles, as well as unlucky Virginia diesel car drivers, who'll also have chosen their vehicles to reduce costs over the equivalent gasoline car...
Even for those looking forward to reduced gas prices, it's unlikely those 17.5 cents per gallon will go straight back in people's pockets.
As the Washington Examiner highlights, it's likely that oil companies, wholesalers and gas stations will bump up prices to make the most of it--a saving of 10-12 cents per gallon for consumers is more realistic.
The proposed changes could very well improve Virginia's budget, as residents from surrounding states make the journey to VA to save even more on already-cheap gas.
But for owners of electric and hybrid vehicles, it may feel like their decision to drive a cleaner car is going completely unappreciated.
You can read more on the governor's proposals on our sister site, TheCarConnection.
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?
If the goal is to reduce gasoline consumption and make up revenue he should jack up the gas tax and/or peg it to inflation.
If the goal is to get reelected, he should appeal to as broad a group as possible and gouge a small, unpopular group regardless of whether it makes sense or not.
What really happens though, is he puts himself on the national stage.
Not really we get exemption on Sales Tax - which adds upto $3K on Leaf - or 30 years worth of $100 a year fees.
While we have all heard about the shortfalls of gas tax revenue due to tax levels not being raised, and more fuel efficient vehicles, the plan by VA is the dumbest idea I've heard to remedy it.
I would thing the best alternative would be a per mile fee with different levels depending on the weight of the vehicle. For states that mandate inspections getting mileage records would be no issue. For states that don't there are certainly ways to make that work.
I agree with others that a better plan would be to tax by mile and weight, but with a rate adjusted by income.
However, I think the "logic" is that gas tax is removed but sales tax is increased. So, some of that revenue will come from sales tax which applies to gasoline as well. In this case, $100 makes some sense for plugins. However, it doesn't make any sense to the Hybrids..
BTW, is this governor Republican?
Whether it be paying per mile/km. or paying an annual additional fee, I'm okay with paying more. But again, what a dumb way to achieve similar revenues... The whole price at the pump side of the argument is utterly baffling...
folks the victims. Sucking $7500 from the poor taxpayers to subsidize their electric cars makes these folks the prime
example of high end welfare.
i mean, this has got to be the epitome of political suicide. guessing he on his last term?
take away one tax to add another takes a TON of money and time. good luck dude, you are going to need it!
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!