My 2013 Tesla Model S Electric Sport Sedan...
Tesla Model S "Delivery Roulette" Annoys Some...
Tesla Model S Road Trip: Electric Cars Make It...
The 85-kWh model has a practical real-world range of at least 200 or so miles, no matter how it's driven.
We'll see what the comparable figures are for the other two, but even the entry-level Model S is likely to deliver the 120-plus miles that many observers feel is the minimum acceptable for owners to avoid range anxiety.
For longer trips, Tesla is rapidly opening a network of Supercharger quick-charge stations--and the power they provide is absolutely free.
Not cheap
The Tesla sport sedan, mind you, is hardly a cheap car.
Prices for the 2013 Model S start at $59,900 for the lowest-range version and rise in $10,000 increments from there, with the Performance version adding $10,000 more on top of the cost for the 85-kWh version.
On the other hand, almost no advanced automotive technology enters the market at the low end--and electric propulsion is just one reason to buy a Model S.
It holds four people comfortably, five people adequately, and Tesla promises a pair of optional child-sized rear-facing jump seats to fit into the load bay at some future point.
No guarantees
Our award is no guarantee that Tesla Motors will survive, that the Model S will provide durable electric transportation for decades to come, or even that battery-electric cars will take noticeable market share any time soon.
But the disbelief, criticism, and sneering that often confronts startup companies with radical new ideas has, in the case of Tesla, already given way to grudging acknowledgment even by skeptics that the 2013 Tesla Model S is a viable, well-built, functional, and competent car that's also fun to drive.
For that reason, there was really little other competition for our Best Car To Buy Award for 2013.
Congratulations, Tesla.
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?
Guess "the disbelief, criticism, and sneering that often confronts startup companies with radical new ideas" is indeed starting to change to "grudging acknowledgment even by skeptics that the 2013 Tesla Model S is a viable, well-built, functional, and competent car that's also fun to drive" and that's the sort of acknowledgement Tesla needs to survive.
I think a startup needs to do things better than anyone else to prove it has a right to exist and the increasing number of awards testify that Tesla has really succeeded in doing just that.
Great choice and great work by Tesla!
When the smart consumer realizes that, EVs will start to come into their own. When consumers realize that they can incorporate a much shorter range (and cheaper), then the revolution will be in full swing!
That is probably more miles than all the Tesla S sedans going to cover in the next 2 years.
The point is to build many EVs for the mainstream consumers, not few super good EVs for the wealthy.
But selling few thousands of Tesla S @ $100k per year aren't going to saving nearly as much oil/gas as a cheap version of the Nissan Leaf that gets 150 miles EV range that sells in the tens of thousands.
Or even extra 100,000 45mpg+ cars on the road to replace the 25mpg+ cars...
When Tesla can come out with a sedan that goes more than 150 miles AND cost less than $35k, then I would really think they "did" it.
For now, it is still the "BEST CAR TO BUY WHEN MONEY IS NO CONCERN".
But with the "low" number of EVs on the market today, I would say that impact is still FAR SMALLER than what the hybrids did in improving the overall fuel consumption. (I am saying this with the fact that I don't like Prius). Prius probably has done FAR MORE in saving gas than Tesla has done in its existance.
With that said, I do agree that Tesla has started a "revolution". Debunking the myth that EVs can't be competitive or people don't want it. But we should realize the fact that the largest IMPACT to overall efficiency will come from the LEAST efficent segment (SUV/Truck) and highest quanitity (Affordable midsize family car).
It appears that you are deeply unset by our selection of the Tesla Model S as our 2013 Best Car To Buy. Got that.
Can we move along to another topic now?
In states with the very dirtiest grids--ND + WV, IIRC--a 50-mpg car like the Toyota Prius is slightly greener. In California, however, where more plug-in cars will be sold than in the next 5 states combined, the grid is relatively clean and electric cars are DECISIVELY cleaner and lower carbon.
But as you say in a prior comment--one of seven you seem to have spewed out--"anyone can say pretty much anything they like" on the Internet.
It just might help make your case if you had actual facts & data behind you when you say it.
Unless you can produce reputable studies that counter the 2007 EPRI-NRDC study or the more conservative 2012 UCS study, with respect ... you're just blowing smoke.
Your accusations that GCR is "a shill for Tesla Motors" neatly balance out those of our readers who insist that our coverage is biased against Tesla and intended to cause the company to fail.
To the substance of your complaint, however: Do you REALLY think that Tesla Model S buyers are not aware of the car's capabilities? That anyone who spends $60K to $100K on a rare all-electric car from a brand-new and virtually unknown automaker won't do their research first?
RLY?
You can now choose to have the car door handles extend as you approach the vehicle. As far as aggressive regen braking you can now choose a lower regen which gives a less agressive feel.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!