Russian Billionaire's Natural-Gas Hybrid...
Electric-Car Deliveries? Mercedes-Benz Says...
Why Buy Green Cars? For the Cost Savings, Not...
Let's face it: political discourse in the U.S. isn't very pretty. It's generally a matter of two large parties -- each backed by an army of fundraisers, copywriters, and statisticians -- shouting at each other in front of sympathetic audiences.
Over the past couple of decades, the situation seems to have gotten worse, though that's probably because we've entered the age of the 24-hour news cycle, and pundits have to speak shrilly to get heard.
As a result of the country's increasingly partisan atmosphere, most Americans have taken sides. It's very rare to find true "independent" voters these days, much less those who are "undecided".
There are, however, a handful of states in which the left and the right balance out, making them key battleground areas. The number is small -- CNN sees nine such states, the Huffington Post sees six -- but the way in which they vote will determine the coming U.S. presidential race.
And according to at least one news source, a key issue in those states is renewable energy.
Energy and the election
Energy reporter Phil Zahodiakin points out that although issues like Medicare and job creation will remain front-and-center in the campaign, energy production is a very hot topic -- particularly in swing states like Iowa.
Wind, for example, is increasingly big business in the state. In fact, it's so big that Iowa's Republican Senator Chuck Grassley has pushed long and hard for a wind-energy tax credit extension heavily supported by President Obama. That's put him in direct opposition to Governor Romney, who's said that he would like to see the credit eliminated.
Zahodiakin points out two reasons that the public could be paying more attention to such energy policy discussions than they have in previous years:
1. The unusually warm winter and record-breaking summer -- not to mention the recent fires, thunderstorms, and ongoing droughts -- have made average Americans think more about the hazards of climate change. Although we're as quick as anyone to point out that "weather" and "climate" are two very different things, the current meteorologic anomalies have forced people to consider the "what ifs".
2. Moreover, oil and gas production is surging in the U.S. In fact, as we pointed out several months ago, America has become a net gasoline exporter. And yet, prices at the pump remain high and imports from Saudi Arabia are growing again. While some on the right will undoubtedly point to that as a reason for greater oil production, others will argue that no amount of drilling can pull us out of the current crisis and that we need to prioritize alternative energy production.
Given our focus here at GCR, we would add a third item to Zahodiakin's list: the increasing visibility of hybrid and electric cars.
Though not at the forefront of today's presidential debates, we believe that growing popularity of hybrid models like the Toyota Prius, the introduction of fully electric models like the Nissan Leaf, and clever vehicles like the Chevrolet Volt (which sits just between the two), have changed American minds about the future of transportation.
Once upon a time, the idea of an electric car -- or even a partially electric one -- might've seemed far-fetched to the average citizen. And while most Americans aren't ready to make the jump just yet, it's hard to deny that electric vehicle technology is here, and it's making rapid advances.
Putting aside arguments about the dirty sources of electricity, this may have a subtle effect on U.S. opinions about energy conservation. The idea of vehicles that depend on electricity as much or more than they do fossil fuels could make voters more interested in alternative energy resources like wind and solar -- not to mention the politicians who support them.
That goes double in states like Iowa, where wind energy is becoming a growth industry and where a presidential election hangs in the balance.
Do you think renewable energy (and alternative-fuel vehicles) could influence the upcoming election?
Leave us your thoughts in the Comments below.
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?
Buttressing this view are satellite readings of U.S. shoreline ocean temperatures via satellite, and not polluted by weather station siting issues - they show no record warmth.
It then turns out that he's talking about a paper that's not even written and his preferred statistician doesn't want his name attached to it.
I trust you're aware the satellite readings have had to be adjusted about 7 times, almost always in a positive direction.
As for the USHCN data, you should probably read the link below carefully before dismissing the work of real experts
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research
following a closed fuel cycle strategy. France has begun replacing all their nuclear fleet, half being fast reactor Generation 4 types. UAE in the Middle East has also ordered reactors. Nuclear power is by far the cheapest source of energy
and produces less than half the carbon emissions of solar panels
hahah.
For any government to ignore rapidly evolving disruptive technologies, that are inexpensive and non-polluting, would be foolish...especially in light of the recent announcement by the UN about diesel exhaust being declared a "Known Human Carcinogen". That links oil burning directly to expensive health care costs.
Tailpipes are Taboo...
What politicians will be brave enough to lead us into that new world?
To illustrate, 33.636 billion kWh per year of electricity was used to produce oil in the US in 2005. (source nationmaster.com)
In 2005, the US produced 8,321,800 b/day which is 127.573 billion gal/yr of oil. (source: US EIA)
The electricity usage per gallon for oil production in the US = 33.636 billion kWh/yr / 127.573 billion gal/yr = 0.26 kWh/gal.
Oil production (0.26 kWh/gal) and oil refining (0.17 kWh/gal) are major consumers of electricity in the steps involved in taking oil in the ground and turning it into gasoline in your car.
If it really took 15 kWh/gal, then electricity alone would be adding around $1.50/gal to the cost of gasoline. It doesn't come close to that.
Have a look at:
http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/08/17/china-environment-idINDEE87G0BU20120817
http://tamino.wordpress.com/2012/08/20/one-down/
Undersea volcanoes have nothing to do with it.
I think we should have something new - like:
- grandchildren survivalists
- humanity futurists
- common sense oriented living
- but, most perfect - sustainable living.
Maybe its because I use my brain to make decisions instead of party lines.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!