Modern diesel-engined cars are quiet, provide lots of torque, get great gas mileage and are much cleaner than diesel engines of yore.
Prejudice, however, not to mention some old-fashioned snobbery amongst Rolls-Royce customers, means that the Sprit of Ecstasy is unlikely to throb to the sound of an oil-burning engine any time soon.
Speaking with Autocar, an un-named source at the luxury British automaker said that it had asked customers for feedback on a potential diesel-engined car.
It was told, in no uncertain terms, that no-one would buy one.
“They wouldn’t entertain the idea,” Autocar was told. “They said absolutely not, don’t bring diesel anywhere near a Rolls-Royce, we won’t buy it.”
Steeped in years of tradition, Rolls-Royce isn’t seen as a brand at the front of automotive innovation.
But thanks to parent company BMW, the luxury automaker has access to everything from diesel and hybrid engine technology through to pure-electric drivetrains.
Sometimes, it has even experimented with them.
Back in March 2011, Rolls-Royce wooed the audience at the 2011 Geneva Motor Show with an all-electric 102 EX Phantom Electric.
After a world-wide tour however, it announced that the 102 EX would never make it into production.
The reason?
Rolls-Royce said its customers believed the all-electric Phantom’s charging time and range per charge were simply not good enough.
In other words, Phantom customers were unwilling to have a car that inconvenienced them by requiring a lengthy recharging when its battery pack ran flat.
It’s the same sense of being inconvenienced, of giving up a given luxury, that Rolls-Royce blames for the frosty reception to the idea of a diesel Rolls.
“A diesel has a lot of low end torque, but customers are not going to cop it,” the un-named source said. “It’s the perception of compromise.”
What do Rolls-Royce customers expect a diesel engine would compromise?
We’re not sure, but guess it has something to do a worry that a diesel engine won’t be as quiet, refined, or as sweet-smelling as a V-12 six-liter gasoline engine.
But what do you think?
Let us know in the Comments below.
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?
By contrast Rolls Royce buyers flaunt an iconic silver lady leaping from their hoods - retractable of course, to discourage theft or tampering!
If as Dan Neil says, the snarling growl of a Ferrari heard from blocks away represents the presence of "bad men with gold watches and track suits." What does that expensive sculpture on the Roll Royce hood project at the worst recession ever. I am a recycling and reusing, tree huggin' greenie? Nope, gasoline and oil guzzling, oxygen sensor trashing, more platinum/palladium in my cat con than the queens jewelry collection? Yep. Diesel? No chance!
We know electric cars can be faster than any petrol powered car (see Tesla Roadster). With a pricetag of $500k for some of these top end cars I am sure they could easily get a big enough battery in there to cover 500 miles per charge and a motor big enough to cream their current gas guzzling models.
You would think the ultra rich would want to be "different" than all the other dime-a-dozen rich losers in their high end gas guzzlers.
They could be driving faster, quieter (so as not to disturb their morning newspaper read on the way in to work), smoother driving and better handling EV's but they are too stupid to look at the facts.
It's almost comical how good my Renault is at being quiet and smooth. Power is also much cheaper to add.
There is a storm coming and the dinosaur car companies are mostly clueless.
Can't wait...would start that electric luxury car company right now if I had the money. It's a no brainer.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!