Advertisement

Should U.S. Cut Import Duties On Electric-Car Parts?

 
Follow Antony

Photo from flickr user Photos8.com

Photo from flickr user Photos8.com

Enlarge Photo

Related Photo Galleries


See more photos »

Import tariffs are a double-edged sword.

On the one hand, they're necessary to protect national industry, making it more expensive for overseas companies--who may have cheaper production costs--to sell their products here, allowing domestic brands to compete.

On the other, it makes it more expensive for domestic companies to buy in necessary components from overseas--such as those required to build electric vehicles. So should the U.S. cut import duties on these components?


To its credit, the U.S. is considering low-to-zero tariffs on several types of components needed for electric vehicles.

These components are listed under a special import category, explains dcautogeek. The exemption is known under the acronym MTB, or "miscellaneous tariff bill", where tariffs are eliminated or reduced when there is no domestic production, and therefore no risk of competition to domestic firms.

Senator Carl Levin recently submitted a list of tariff reductions and suspensions on products relevant to the electric and hybrid car industry in the U.S. The products on the list include lithium-ion batteries, inverters, motor generators and more.

If these reductions are passed, it could benefit the U.S. electric and hybrid car industry in terms of lower production costs.

Would these cost reductions be passed on to the consumer? That's less certain, but the lower costs are still beneficial overall as it provides more encouragement for companies to press on with developing high-technology vehicles, without incurring high development costs.

On the other hand, some worry that the tariff reductions may disincentivize domestic companies from developing similar technologies themselves, potentially harming the industry in the long run.

Let us know whether you think import tariffs on electric vehicle components should be cut or reduced, using the comments section below.

+++++++++++

Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (2)
  1. "Necessary to protect national industry"? That's a discredited argument that if you don't understand it anyway, is taught in Economics 101. Borders are artificial. It's just a tax. Should Safeway pay higher tax so that Whole Foods can prosper? No.
     
    Post Reply
    -1
    Bad stuff?

  2. If it benefits the American consumer, then "yes", but I cannot see this benefiting the consumer at all. It is not even benefiting the automakers when they can make these parts here in America just as cheap, and 'yes', they can make them just as cheat...they use to - remember. A geothermal power plant in California produces 100 tons of lithium a year and that is shipped to China. How much could you save if you didn't ship the lithium to China...you could save a lot, right? Quadruple the tariffs and force America to start making their own parts again; you would be amazed how cheaply they can do it.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2013 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.