Advertisement

Jaguar C-X75 Plug-In Supercar: Turbines For Track Only

Follow Antony

Jay Leno drives the Jaguar C-X75 Concept

Jay Leno drives the Jaguar C-X75 Concept

Enlarge Photo
You may recognize the Jaguar C-X75 supercar from the 2010 Paris Auto Show, where it wowed the critics and public alike.

You may also remember that the car was destined to be a plug-in, range-extended vehicle, the electric motors supplemented not by a regular gasoline engine, but by a series of microturbines.

Unfortunately, Inside Line reports (via Motor Authority) that although the car has been confirmed for launch in late 2013, the road-going versions won't use the turbine technology.

Instead, the production car will use a more conventional, turbocharged gasoline engine to provide the extra range.

Predictably, it was engineering problems that curtailed the development of the roadgoing jet-powered Jags.

Early testing has shown that the twin microturbines would have required excessive cooling - as much as 16.8 square feet of intakes, or more than the entire frontal area of the concept! That's a shame, as jet turbines are quite simple mechanically, and also each 77-pound turbine would allow the car to be lighter than if equipped with a standard engine. Jaguar, along with Blaydon Jets, is still developing the jet-powered C-X75 for track use only.

Not that the road car will have a "standard" engine. Developed together with Cosworth and the Williams F1 team, the 1.6-liter turbocharged unit could develop as much as 500 horsepower.

Coupled with a high-output electric drivetrain, the setup should make for an incredibly high-performance car, but one with the ability to cruise around city centers emissions-free.

Testing of prototype C-X75s is expected to commence in the middle of this year.
Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (3)
  1. 500 HP from a 1.6 liter engine, really?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  2. Yes, if you read the linked Inside Line article, it is rated at 313 hp/liter (which may be a record, I'm not sure), putting it at just 500 hp.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  3. Holy &*^$ So what is wrong with the 1.8 liter engine in my Corolla? I think it produces a lot less than 500 HP. Maybe it needs a new air filter. :)
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!
Advertisement

Advertisement

 
© 2014 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by izmo, Inc.