Advertisement

$1 Billion For 100-MPG Mid-Size Gasoline Car? Bill Proposes Federal Cash Prize

 
Follow Nikki

Photo from flickr user Photos8.com

Photo from flickr user Photos8.com

Enlarge Photo

Related Photo Galleries


See more photos »

Some Republicans aren't fans of plug-in cars.

That much was clear from the official hearing of the House Committee on Oversight & Government Reform into the NHTSA’s conduct during its investigation into Chevrolet Volt battery safety.

Now Congressman Dan Lungren (R-CA) has introduced a bill that would offer $1 billion in Federal prize money to the first U.S. car company that sells 60,000 mid-sized sedans that achieve 100 mpg. 


Using gasoline. 

Capitol Hill

Capitol Hill

Enlarge Photo

If the concept of offering a prize for a car that can get more than 100 mpg sounds familiar, you’re right. It is. 

Back in 2007, the X Prize Foundation announced the Progressive Insurance Automotive X Prize -- a $10 million prize fund dedicated to help bring mass-market fuel-efficient vehicles to market.

In order to win, entrants had to prove their vehicles could achieve 100 mpg or equivalent, travel safely at highway speeds, and emit less than 200 grams of carbon dioxide per mile travelled. 

The original idea had its merits, but by the time the Automotive X Prize was judged in 2010, the event had become a showcase for small-sized, unusual -- and sometimes controversial -- vehicles that left us asking who would really want to drive them

Eighteen months after the competition ended, not a single vehicle from the Automotive X Prize has entered production. 

But unlike that contest, Lungren’s legislation would release funds to the winner only after it had produced 60,000 eligible vehicles in the U.S. and delivered them to U.S. customers. 

Essentially, that rules out startup automakers using the funds to develop a winning car.

The bill also requires the winning company to be "incorporated in the U.S.," apparently offering $1 billion only to the Detroit Three (General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler). 

Automotive X PRIZE Aptera 2e

Automotive X PRIZE Aptera 2e

Enlarge Photo

There’s more. 

H.R. 3872, otherwise known as the Excellence In energy Efficiency Act of 2012, is carefully worded to ensure that the prize fund is only awarded to an automaker that produces a mid-size sedan that has a gas mileage of 100 mpg or better.

That rules out all the subcompact and compact cars we’ve seen come to market high-gas mileage, small-capacity, four-cylinder turbocharged engines in the past year. 

It also rules out pure plug-in cars like the Nissan Leaf, Ford Focus Electric, and Mitsubishi i, because they do not run on gasoline.

Although the bill doesn't appear to preclude electrification, we think any vehicle that can produce that level of efficiency in a mid-sized sedan almost certainly requires hybrid technology and other energy-recapture mechanisms.

In other words, we think it would be hard to make a winning car without using at least some elements of plug-in hybrid technology. 

Today, we can’t think of a single car that even comes close to the requirements set out in Lungren’s bill.

But since the legislation proposes no time limit to the prize fund, it could be several years -- even decades -- before an automaker achieves the required criteria.

As political news site The Hill points out, the prize fund is a little like the 18th-century British prize fund that promised £20,000 to the first person to find a way of determining longitude at sea. 

Originally set out in 1714, that prize remained unclaimed for 51 years. 

If passed, we hope the same doesn’t remain true for H.R. 3872.

+++++++++++

Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.





Posted in:
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (8)
  1. Where do the republicans think they are going to get 1 billion dollars to put in reserve for one to two centuries, and how are they going to pay it back? I don't want my great great grandchildren paying for their loose brainlessness. The automakers said it will take them 50 years to get autos up to 60 MPG; although Japan can already get 60 MPG in some of their cars. That's why we started building electric cars, because it will take too long to get the cars up to 60 MPG.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  2. Won't happen. But even if it did, it's chump change for the oil companies to keep consumers addicted to their "drug" as supplies dwindle and prices rise.
     
    Post Reply
    +2
    Bad stuff?

  3. I'd rather see the prize offered for a 30% efficient Solar PV module. Solar PV modules are roughly 15-19% max efficiency now. With such efficiency benefits of 2x energy density, nearly all homes could have solar PV at a reasonable cost. Then, that extra energy could be used the charge EVs and EREVs like Volts, Leafs.

    It shouldn't be the consumer that the prize goes to (the engine) - it should be the producer (the energy source). Make electricity cheap from the "free" resource we all have available to us - the sun. It's not going anywhere.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. We already did this once with the big three, in 1993, called the Partnership for Next Generation Vehicles, it achieved up to 80 mpg.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partnership_for_a_New_Generation_of_Vehicles

    Again, nothing was ever produced.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

     
  5. Nothing was produced because the program was a ripoff of the preceding program of the preceding administration. If you read further, John, Ralph Nader remarks to this. The program was never intended to produce anything except image.

    Sometimes it pays to know people in places; sometimes it doesn't.

    Peace
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. Is it CAFE MPG or EPA sticker MPG? The 50 MPG Prius is rated over 70 CAFE MPG.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. I hope Tesla becomes the next Apple! These corrupt people can keep driving their gas vehicles.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. Funny story... It isn't a matter of can it be done, because it CAN. It is a matter of who qualifies as a contestant and whether that contestant has the funds to compete.

    Peace
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2013 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.