Advertisement

Swiss Catecar Gives Up On Compressed-Air Car, Goes Electric

 
Follow John

Catecar Swiss green high-tech urban vehicle rendering, Jan 2012

Related Photo Galleries


See more photos »
Catecar Swiss green high-tech urban vehicle rendering, Jan 2012

Catecar Swiss green high-tech urban vehicle rendering, Jan 2012

Enlarge Photo

You may recall that a few years ago, there was a flurry of interest in compressed-air cars.

In the end, it didn't pan out. Compressed air just isn't a dense enough form of energy storage to make it practical for vehicle use--even in very lightweight cars--and no such passenger car is sold anywhere in the world.

Now the Swiss startup carmaker Catecar has given up on compressed air altogether.


Instead, it redesigned its prototype minicar to use electric drive, with a small battery pack and a tiny range extender to give it a total range of up to 300 miles.

Airport testing

Earlier today, Catecar announced at a press event in Switzerland that it was delivering an early version of its newly electric car--Prototype No. 1--to the authority that operates Geneva International Airport, which will test it on the tarmac.

A second, more complete prototype of the "Swiss Green High Tech Urban Vehicle" is to be delivered in April; based on test results, Catecar hopes to build up to 200 vehicles to be tested in airport use, which doesn't require the vehicles to be certified for use on public roads.

Assuming that goes well, the company will continue development, with the goal of certifying the vehicle for public sale in Switzerland by the end of this year. It hopes to begin volume production next year, with sales in other markets thereafter.

Tiny, light, inexpensive

The test vehicle is just a shade less than 10 feet long, and less than 5 feet wide and high.

Its body is to be made of inexpensive and lightweight flax fibers, specially treated to strengthen them for shock resistance and crash safety. The company says the entire body will weigh less than 700 pounds.

Catecar didn't specify the capacity of the battery pack, but says it weighs just 77 pounds, which suggests a capacity of 4 to 10 kilowatt-hours depending on how it's structured, how integrated the electronics are, and whether it uses air or liquid thermal conditioning.

Power from solar cells?

It also gave no details on either the electric drive motor's output power or the layout of the tiny range-extending engine, although it says that the engine will return 235 miles per gallon (100 km per liter of fuel).

Catecar Swiss green high-tech urban vehicle rendering, Jan 2012

Catecar Swiss green high-tech urban vehicle rendering, Jan 2012

Enlarge Photo

We note that Catecar's background materials also tout the photovoltaic solar cells on the car's roof as an energy source.

Since a similar solar moonroof on the 2012 Toyota Prius only generates enough power to run a pair of cabin ventilation fans, we're skeptical that this contributes much to the Catecar's motive power.

Catecar says its car's batteries will be recharged "using either the solar roof, or the range extender" or "if so needed, by plugging into the grid."

That the solar roof comes first and grid power is mentioned last seems unusual--since pretty much every other electric car is recharged using grid power.

But we'll wait for full details on the car to emerge before making any lasting judgments on Catecar's technology.

Development but no technology

Founded in August 2008, Catecar licensed compressed-air technology from a company called MDI, intending to build its AirPod cars in Switzerland. But MDI wasn't able to deliver the goods in January 2011 as promised.

Still, the idea of a Swiss automaker producing a light, inexpensive, zero-emission urban car generated a huge amount of interest--and, Catecar says, purchase orders.

That led the company to redirect its development goals, using additional funds from its original investors.

A sentence in its press release indicates that it may also be seeking individual and community investments: "By opening itself to small shareholders wishing to take part to a meaningful industrial yet green project, Catecar wishes to create tight bonds with local communities."

+++++++++++

Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (14)
  1. Nice article. I have been wondering how MDI has been doing. Last time I looked at this, it was pretty clear to me that the efficiency of compressed air is terrible. Also, you would need to use special 10,000 psi carbon fiber tanks developed for the hydrogen fuel cell efforts to get any reasonable range.

    One side benefits of compressed air technology, free air conditioning. Interesting contrast to ICE with free heating.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  2. The info at http://www.mdi.lu/english/actualite.php implies they've made significant progress with the AirPod but that was posted in mid-Nov and nothing since.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  3. Nick,
    Thanks for the link.
    "Test-driving of AirPod will be organised for the media personnel and for the public in near future"

    We have been waiting for that for many years.
    John C. Briggs
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. Did anyone else have flash-backs to 2008 when small lightweight NEVs were being introduced as the next big think in automotive transportation? Nice to see that a long dismissed idea here in America has found its way to Switzerland.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  5. Judging by some of the concepts to come out of Europe (Renault Twizy, VW Nils, Audi Urban Concept, Opel RAK-E etc) it's still fresh in carmakers' minds... though basic Twizy aside none of the above are technically NEVs. And only the Twizy is confirmed for production...
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  6. Ah, good points. Personally, I like the Twizy but can't imagine using it here in rainy Boston, MA USA.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. Antony, I am very interested in the enclosed quadracycle concept examples you listed, and desperately hope they reach production, as they will be the most affordable, efficient and practical 2 seat EV configurations.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. It's not much of an inducement to know that there is a company so technologically obtuse that they couldn't figure out the limitations of compressed air without spending a small fortune and prototyping. This car design anticipates very expensive batteries for the extended future. If that assumption is wrong (as I believe it to be), then this car will become very undesirable due to its cramped design.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  9. Ramon,

    I agree that they should have been able to figure out in a very short time, that not only was compressed air unworkable because of it's energy density, but also because of it's poor efficiency, and it's explosive safety challenge, too.

    I differ with you slightly, though on size. In general a good design is one that is big enough, but not too big for it's intended purpose. There is no way to compensate for being small and nimble and easy to drive; and easy to park.

    Neil
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  10. The compressed air piston engine is a very noisy and relatively inefficent method of implementing compressed air tech. Far more viable is the rotary air motor by engineair:

    www.engineair.com.au

    Below is a link to how you implement a viable compressed air powertrain technology:

    http://o2pursuitdeanbenstead.wordpress.com/

    For those who obsess over a single criterion, like efficiency alone, you completely miss an entire market segment. For now and the foreseable future, the BEV is too expensive, too heavy and takes too long to recharge to have much utility. A compressed air vehicle would be very cheap, very light and can be quickly recharged from a large reservoir tank. This tech would be perfect for low tech, 3rd world nations.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  11. Ah, low efficiency means high cost. Also, the devil is in the details. These are not simple steel air cylinders, they are composite cylinders which means high cost.

    I would suggest that if compressed air worked, MDI would have had something worth showing by now.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  12. Those carbon fiber pressure vessals don't compare to dozens of kWh's worth of batteries. Compressed air is far simpler and far cheaper to implement, and any added cost due to less efficiency is easily accepted compared to the high upfront costs of batteries, complex maintenance and slow recharge times. Compressed air technologies are perfect for 3rd world nations that can easily handle pnuematics versus battery and their controllers.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  13. As for Catecar, they, like Th!nk will have optimized in the wrong direction. No one with enough money to buy an EV will buy a vehicle with so little room and utility. They should have stuck with compressed air and built their powertrain around engineair's rotary air motor.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  14. They should just buy up the Think molds and get one with it, car looks almost identical.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2013 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.