Advertisement

Audi To Sell Electric Urban Concept, Join The Not-Quite-Car Parade?

 
Follow John

Audi Urban Concept launch, 2011 Frankfurt Auto Show

Related Photo Galleries


See more photos »
Audi Urban Concept launch, 2011 Frankfurt Auto Show

Audi Urban Concept launch, 2011 Frankfurt Auto Show

Enlarge Photo

If one is a fluke and two is coincidence, then three makes a trend for sure.

Audi is close to approving plans to build a limited number of the all-electric two-seat Urban Concept vehicle that it launched at the recent Frankfurt Motor Show, according to CAR magazine in England,

If built for sale, most likely only in Europe, the production Audi Urban Concept would join the Volkswagen XL1 and the Renault Twizy in the category of "not-quite-cars," or low-speed electric vehicles.


The battery-electric vehicle was displayed at Frankfurt in two versions, a closed coupe with a one-piece roof-greenhouse-and-doors hatch that opened on struts to admit people, and an Urban Spyder Concept version with an open-air body.

CAR magazine drove a prototype Urban Concept, and concluded its remarkably favorable review by saying, "Young, simple, alternative, affordable and fun to drive, the Urban Concept sends a promising message from a brand which has taken itself too serious [sic] for far too long."

Volkswagen XL1 Concept

Volkswagen XL1 Concept

Enlarge Photo

In some European countries, those vehicles can be driven by 16-year-olds, whereas they must wait until age 18 to pilot regular cars.

Volkswagen said earlier this year it would build small numbers of the XL1, an ultra-efficient two-seater using a small plug-in hybrid powertrain to obtain gas mileage of well over 200 miles per gallon.

And the Renault Twizy is already entering production in France, in two different versions: a lower-power model that can be registered as a low-speed electric vehicle, and a more powerful version that qualifies as a regular, highway-capable car.

Renault Twizy Z.E. electric vehicle

Renault Twizy Z.E. electric vehicle

Enlarge Photo

We continue to think we won't see any of these vehicles sold in the U.S., whose drivers cover more miles daily, in more suburban travel patterns, sharing the road with 3-ton SUVs that are still largely absent from Europe and Asia.

But the idea of these not-quite-cars being offered by real carmakers, including some of the largest names in the global industry, remains intriguing.

What do you think of these tiny two-seat vehicles?

Leave us your thoughts in the Comments below.

+++++++++++

Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (8)
  1. I definitely want one of the Audi cars. Perfect for my urban commute.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. I love this category and would buy any of the three if it became available in the US (and assuming US / state laws allowed it). If you seldom use the highway, a 50 mph vehicle is all you need, and the light weight and tandom seating makes them very efficient. Opel will definitely produce the RAKe now.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. If I were running an auto company, I would realize that building what I call "high battery cost" vehicles (vehicles whose design tries to overcome the expense of batteries) is in all likelihood a waste of time and a bet that affordable batteries are far down the road. I don't happen to believe that, so I would not waste money developing such cars - I would, if anything, pay attention to Tesla's designs, which I consider right on target for
    electrical drivetrain propulsion.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. I'm with John B and Jason H, I think. Stylish and I'm already an Audi driver (and put up with the quality problems...). None of these will work for my current commute, but get one of these to me soon and I might be open to changing jobs to make it work.
    Ramon, VW is an established, profitable company doing extremely well. Tesla is a startup with little change of surviving. I love Tesla as much as the next EV fan, but the busienss model is horrendous, as is noted repeatedly. If you really think they're going to be profitable in the next 5-10 years selling EVs that start at a minimum $60k, we just disagree. Whatever price they quote will continue to rise due to rare earth alone. Electric motors have doubled in a 18/mo.
     
    Post Reply
    -1
    Bad stuff?

     
  5. Selling fantastic looking, practical cars with great range at prices that make them the best value for money in the business seems like a pretty good business model to me. Tesla's batterycost seems to be pretty low and I doubt their motors contain rare earth if they use the same AC propulsion motors for the Model S as they did for the Roadster. If Musk really manages to bring a car to the market on schedule that's as good as he claims at the price he promised I think Tesla's position is golden. Note that the 2012 Model S (mostly premium models) is already sold out. Tesla's position is further strengthened by associations with with Panasonic, Daimler and Toyota. I really see no businessmodel problems here.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  6. I would love to have the Twizy if they would make it wider so it would be more stable in curves and get the speed up to 70 MPH. I know better high power batteries are coming quicker than you think and the Twizy should be able to get 3 to 4 hundred miles between charges.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  7. "I know better high power batteries are coming quicker than you think"

    Inside info or just your optimism showing?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  8. These represent pathetic attempts at "Green-Badging"; car makers that parade stupid science-project like vehicles and try and pacify the public with an environmentally friendly product knowing that little or no sales will be made. So sad, when you consider the imaginative high performance early versions of the Audi E-Tron, Mercedes E-Cell, and even the BMW Mini-E. Some manufacturers are already building practical cars that make a ton of sense, do not use fossil fuel, and look nice if not better than the gassers. I'll admit that they are still too expensive and that the charging infrastructure is still feeble. But, given the choice, I'll never buy another gasser, and can't wait to get my second all electric drive car.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2013 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.