Advertisement

No, 2012 Ford Focus Electrics Don’t Have Roof-Mounted Solar Panels

Follow Nikki

2012 Ford Focus Electric live at CES 2011

2012 Ford Focus Electric live at CES 2011

Enlarge Photo

Back in August, Ford announced that it would enter into a partnership with solar panel firm SunPower to help 2012 Ford Focus Electric owners install photovoltaic solar panels on their houses, which could let them power their cars from solar energy.

Called “Drive Green For Life”, the scheme entitles Ford’s Focus Electric customers to a massive discount on the purchase and installation costs of a 2.5-kilowatt peak photovoltaic solar panel array. 

The idea, of course, is that the solar panels generate electricity to charge the car during the day -- or to offset any electricity used at night to charge the car, by feeding power back to the grid where possible. 

As is often the case with the Internet, however, we’ve seen a rather amusing twist to this story. Some websites have claimed that the 2012 Ford Focus Electric will come complete with a 2.5-kilowatt solar array mounted on its roof. 

Oh, dear.

It’s the traditional chain of Chinese whispers: One website prints an inaccurate story, then gets cited by another, before the claim is transformed into an even more inaccurate story. The chain may continue until there are very few real facts left. 

Take the most recent reiteration of this story. Completely confused about the facts, one site actually says that the solar panels will provide enough energy to propel the car along without needing to plug it in. 

“This means being able to drive longer distances without having to stop and recharge your car,” the author claims. “It also conserves energy by relying on solar power to help propel the car along, therefore using less of the power contained within the cars’ battery.”

Err... No. 

2012 Ford Focus Electric launch, New York City, January 2011

2012 Ford Focus Electric launch, New York City, January 2011

Enlarge Photo

For a start, even with today’s modern solar cell technology, a 2.5-kW system normally takes up from 130 to 200 square feet of space - far more than the roof area of any car on the roads today. 

Secondly, even if you could fit it onto a car, such a large solar array would dramatically increase the car’s weight and its aerodynamic drag, leading to much reduced performance and economy. 

To emphasize the point, a Ford spokesperson confirmed to us earlier today that the SunPower solar cells are meant for your home, not your car: “Otherwise all our aerodynamic improvements would be useless”.

But perhaps the funniest part of this story for us is the idea that an electric car -- fully laden with heavy solar cells, five passengers and a full trunk -- could actually drive at freeway speeds on just 2.5 kilowatts of power per hour. 

For the record, the EPA’s official efficiency consumption for the similarly sized 2012 Nissan Leaf is 35 kilowatt-hours per 100 miles -- or 350 watt-hours per mile.  

In other words, that’s equivalent to around 7 miles of travel per hour’s worth of solar energy.  We think you’ll agree the math just doesn’t add up.

Of course, the SunPower home-based photovoltaic system will be an ideal way to offset the electricity you need to charge your electric car when you’re at home. And it will provide clean, renewable energy for your home when your car isn’t plugged in. 

But if you want a car with solar panels that exclusively power the car without depleting its battery pack, your search will lead you to something a little less practical and a whole lot more expensive than a 2012 Ford Focus hatchback. 

+++++++++++

Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.

Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (6)
  1. Isn't it amazing how people comes up with all this verbal garbage. I've never read anywhere where Ford said that they were putting the solar panels on the roof of the car. Must be the Volt worshipers spreading rumors again, or the one who give minus points to comments on this site to people who say '-F' remarks about GM and their crappy Volt.
     
    Post Reply
    -1
    Bad stuff?

  2. I agree it is ridiculous to expect solar panels to provide enough energy to propel a car along without other energy inputs.

    But, I don't agree with the assertion that solar panels on cars are totally impractical. A smaller array could be useful and could be integrated into a car's roof without increasing the aerodynamic drag or any significant weight increase . A solar panel could easily add 2 kW of energy back into the battery daily while your car sits in your employer's parking lot. Leave your car at the airport when on vacation and come back to a car full of free "fuel"!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. Solar cells built into the already aerodynamic lines of a car to complement, not fully charge, the battery system is not impractical or farfetched as implied in this article. I am not at all surprised on Mrs. Gordon-Bloomfield’s comments. Her trend weighs favorably on the oil industry’s perspective or ill wishes towards any renewable technology or promising ideas. Her underlying negative jabs towards the green industry seem prevalent in her articles. Her track record on providing positive insights towards green technology is in question. Perhaps she serves well to write for the gasser industry. We need not more fodder to feed the negative gasser rumor industry.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. Danny, Nikki is right here. There is plenty of anti solar propaganda out there but this is not such a case.

    Mean solar radiation is about 600 watts per square meter, peak efficiency is less than 20% for a solar panel you will find on a car. If you can get 8 hours of that per day, you are doing well. I don't think you can get more than say a half square meter of panel on the roof of a Focus. So here's the math:

    600 x 0.2 x 8 x 0.5 = 0.48 kilo watt hours per day.

    Figuring 90% charging efficiency, you are looking at about 2 months to charge a car with a solar panel. Or less than 2 miles per day of driving from the solar panel.

    Also, 10% shade on a modern solar panel drops the output by maybe 50%, since the cells are in series.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  5. Jim,

    Have you ever tried to find a shady spot in a parking lot? They aren't common outside of garages.

    I appreciate what you're saying but I think you underestimate the real estate available on the average car roof. The Fisker Karma has a 120 watt panel integrated into a modest sized roof. Also, I believe 10 hours of charging per day is possible for a lot of people.

    120 x 10 = 1.2 kW per day

    Other EV's could have solar panels for less than many of the less useful options offered on cars today.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. the innovative inventions and discoveries in the automobile drive not using gasoline no more is contributory factor in reducing not only pollution but also warming of globe.as such i am sansenio@gmail.com would like to be kept informed about green car projects would bring down carbon emissions perfctly.san senior
     
    Post Reply
    -1
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!
Advertisement

Advertisement

 
© 2014 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by izmo, Inc.