Prius Plug-In Hybrid: It Won't Compete With the...
2012 Plug-in Toyota Prius: What Do You Want To...
Why Toyota Will Sell 2012 Prius Plug-Ins: It's...
Meanwhile, the 2012 Prius V is not a plug-in, but it's bound to be a hit. It uses what's essentially the same hybrid powertrain as the 2012 Toyota Prius, yet its body has been reshaped and its interior reconfigured for much-improved rear seating and cargo space—specifically, 80 percent more cargo space than other small SUVs, Toyota claims. The rear seat in the V folds perfectly flat, and it slides fore-and-aft for adjustability. The tradeoff is that the Prius V weighs roughly 300 pound heavier than the Prius, and its additional height and width mean aerodynamics aren't quite as optimized—thus its 44 mpg city, 40 highway EPA ratings.
The 2012 Prius V models cost $27,160 (Prius V Two), $27,925 (Prius V Three), and $30,750 (Prius V Five), also including destination. All Prius V models include Bluetooth connectivity, a USB port, a Display Audio system with backup camera, a Smart Key system, and 16-inch alloy wheels. The Prius V Three adds navigation, Entune, HD Radio with iTunes tagging, while the Five gets heated SofTex front seats, larger alloy wheels, LED headlamps, and fog lamps.
Prius C on the way next year
The automaker is moving rapidly to expand its Prius family into a range of models. Next year, a fourth new model, the 2013 Toyota Prius C, will join the Prius lineup.
Are these cars priced appropriately for the market? Would you buy a Prius Plug-In at this price, or does they need to be more affordable? And do you think the Prius V will draw more families from compact SUVs and crossovers?
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?
Let's assume that you plug in once a day and get 14 miles in the PIP
4.4 KWH/day
0.315 KWH/mile
13.97 miles/day
$0.11 $/KWH
$0.48 $/day
Now assume the same for the normal Prius
50 mpg
14 miles/day
0.28 gallons/day
$3.67 $/gallon
$1.03 $/day
Consider the difference
$0.54 day
365 days/year
$198.41 $/year
10 years
$1,984.14 $/lifetime
So $2000 savings over ten years, which is not much. Hopefully the environmental savings are big, because the cost savings are not.
I am assuming the same MPG for both PIP and normal Prius after the first 14 miles.
Thanks for the insightful comments, and for presenting some useful figures here. With that original 'crunching numbers' post, I should point out, the numbers were based on our covering 77.7 miles out of 103 miles in EV mode (and the battery's software-limited capacity of 3.8 kWh) -- that was as much as we could manage with frequent plugging-in, and limiting the use of the Plug-In to relatively short-distance driving tasks. If you could use the Plug-In ONLY in EV Mode, you'd see that level of savings you're pointing to -- but we doubt very many families will buy it primarily as an EV.
But to the point, you're right -- this was a very limited driving experience, and we look forward to a longer test, and seeing some longer-term numbers.
But who knows. Maybe Prius buyers will see the PIP as a small additional cost for more green-cred and will go for it. It will be interesting to see the sales numbers in a year. Hope that Toyota breaks out the PIP sales numbers separately.
Honestly, I think the Prius is a victim of its own success. When you make a car that gets 50 mpg from gasoline, the savings by going to EV are just going to be small. There isn't that much gasoline to save.
Now, a question for you. "Why do you eliminate the comment section every time you mention "Clean Diesel" in the article? Is it because GM came up with that term and you know that diesel, just like coal, can never be clean? They both will always produce a huge amount of pollution. The 'clean fuel' is all electric.
We monitor all comments and disable those that are clearly spam, use bad language or insult broad classes of people, are duplicates, and for a few other reasons. See our Terms of Use (link is underneath the open comment box at the top of this thread).
But please don't insult us (or our readership) by implying that we delete comments on specific topics. We don't.
The one explanation I can think of is that we don't currently have commenting on our car reviews. But those have a different look and say "Review" at the top, so they'd be hard to confuse with news stories. Here's an example:
http://www.greencarreports.com/overview/scion_iq_2012
So, please provide URLs for the stories you mention. I'd be happy to dig into it if I had any actual details on what you're complaining about.
(In general, when you complain, your thoughts will be taken more seriously if you include links, IMHO.)
Volt - 308 articles
Leaf - 297 articles
Hardly seems like bias to me. Also, I'm still waiting for the URLs of those articles in which we "turn[ed] off the comment section" ....
If a person can get around your mags bias, it is still the best mag for information.
Question: Does GM own a percentage of your mag?
Neither GM nor any other carmaker owns any portion of High Gear Media. We are owned by the venture capital firms that have funded us, with a portion of the shares owned by employees as well.
Finally, I'm not clear why you would use the word "mag" to refer to GreenCarReports. High Gear produces online sites that cover cars. We have no print outlet and likely never would. Hence we are far from a "magazine" and have no desire to be one.
All that said, thanks for your steady contributions and comments!
As for the LEAF versus Volt "bias" perception. Keep in mind that until recently, HGM has maintained a completely separate site for electric vehicles like the LEAF. As a result, GCR often didn't cover the LEAF as this would be redundant.
FYI, every single post from the old AllCarsElectric site was transferred over to GCR when the two sites were combined. The figures I gave for each model were combined totals reflecting content from both sites.
Hate to say "I told you so" But...
What happened to "nicely under $30,000"? John?? ;) lol
So now it's what most industry execs expected (i.e ABOVE $40K) and entire city of Prius aficionados have much egg on their faces.
The Prius community and cheat-beating fanbois are partially to blame here by creating unrealistic expectations with respect to MSRP for an "advanced" Gen 3 Prius.
Hence a myriad of bad math that now resides in out cyberspace expounding the "value" of the PiP and ridiculously chastising the TCO and time to recover costs of the Volt.
Let the crying, whining, and excuses begin.(and no doubt a myriad of "all-new" misleading rationalizations and calcs) LOL
WOT
On the TCO, however, the math will depend entirely on whether you travel only in journeys of 9 to 13 miles at sub-highway speeds, with 2 or 3 hours in between.
OTOH, as we often point out, many people buy Priuses NOT because of any payback equation but to make a statement about their beliefs. So TCO isn't relevant for some, and there will be buyers who simply WANT a plug-in (range be damned) that has the Prius imprimatur.
But yes, I WAS referring to the full-load vs. full-load comparison. As far as the calcs, anticipating opportunity charges on every 13 mile speed-limited segment is more than just a bit unrealistic IMO.Might as well keep your old Prius and get a Wheego or some other NEV...
Indeed the "value proposition" is severely lacking for the PiP, as well as the LEAF and VOLT for that matter.
All I can figure is that market research has shown that there is no market for a poorly equipped EV (EREV or whatever) at a $25,000 price point. So you might as well go up-market for $35,000 or $40,000 with many options that wealthier buyers prefer.
Voelcker probably has better insights on this issue.
The marketing guys might be right. We will see.
In any case, we still have the same old problems of oil supply, trade deficits, pollution, and global warming if we cannot find a solution to the gasoline car problem.
My teen wants a sports car because of its looks: why can't I want a Prius because of its looks?
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!