Aptera Answers Our Questions, Shares No New...
2010 Detroit Auto Show: The Confusing Wrongness...
2012 Nissan Leaf: More Standard Equipment...
Nissan Shares Nismo RC Electric Race Car...
Nissan Gives 2012 Leaf Sporty Makeover...
If you’ve got a 2011 Nissan Leaf SL you probably ordered it with the included $700 rapid charging port, capable of recharging its 24 kilowatt-hour battery pack to 80 percent full in a little under 30 minutes using an off-board rapid charger.
But direct-current rapid charging stations using the Chademo protocol haven’t been adopted in the U.S., partly due to their size and cost among other reasons.
As a consequence, there are very few public charging stations in existence.
That may change however, with the announcement of a smaller, cheaper, more lightweight rapid charging station from Japanese Nichicon Corporation.
Up to 50 percent smaller and weighing less than a third of any other rapid charging station on the market, the NCQ-202 and CHQ-203 rapid chargers should be easier to install in tight parking lots
At a price of between $25,000 and $27,000 the Nichicon charging stations will also cost a lot less to buy than other larger charging stations -- which have traditionally cost around $40,000 to buy.
However, there is a trade-off for a smaller charging station and a lower purchase price: speed.
Unlike larger charging stations which are capable of providing up to 50 kilowatts of power to recharge compatible cars like the 2012 Nissan Leaf and 2012 Mitsubishi i, the Nichicon charging stations can only provide between 20 and 30 kilowatts of power.
This translates to slightly longer recharging times, meaning a car like the 2012 Nissan Leaf would take around an hour to recharge from empty instead of the 30 minutes it takes using a more powerful rapid charging station.
Given the drop in speed, expect the Nichicon charging stations to be best suited to shopping malls and grocery stores rather than freeway rest stops.
[Nichicon via engadget]
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?
it will cost the customer extra (in one way or the other), such that said customer will recharge at home whenever possible.
battery range is already pretty decent (100 miles) for most people. that range will still improve by quite a lot. 10 years from now we will very likely be at 200-300.
as i have stated many times in the past, the only recharging network that we will need will be at our truck stops. electric big rigs will overtake our current diesels.
vacationers would also be able to stop and juice up.
the biggest issue is supply. we cant manufacture anywhere near enough at this point. but as many car companies start rolling off their first models, we will be able to ramp up our production.
the second issue is price. as production goes up, price will come down. and it will come down only enough to sell the cars that they can make.
evs are so much better than ices in almost every regard, that no one is gonna want to spend new bucks on an ice.
people will get new evs, or buy used ices. this will occur much faster than all the "experts" are predicting.
How damaging is Level 3 to battery life? I recall a claim that even daily Level 3 charging would only reduce battery life by an additional 5-10% over 7 years
http://www.solarroadways.com/main.html
If it's technologically feasible, it'll probably happen in Australia, somewhere in the Middle East or Mexico before the US.
When AC Propulsion's "reductive" charging technology gets more widely accepted, these half way measures will be a questionable investment. Most EVs in the long run will need nothing more than a sturdy EVSE at around $1000 to charge in 2 hours or less.
But these are early days. We will see how it pans out. The Japanese have always sold cheaper products with expensive accessories
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!