Advertisement

Obama Budget Kills Clean-Diesel Retrofit, Fuel-Cell Funding

 
Follow John

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency adminstrator Lisa Jackson and President Barack Obama

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency adminstrator Lisa Jackson and President Barack Obama

Enlarge Photo

The budget that will be submitted to Congress on Monday by President Barack Obama contains cuts for two clean-vehicle programs: retrofits that reduce diesel emissions from heavy trucks and other commercial vehicles, and research funds for hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles.

Whether those cuts will survive the budgeting process remains to be seen.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Diesel Program had been funded at $80 million in 2010, and it was reauthorized last December by Congress for five years at a cost of $500 million.


U.S. Capitol

U.S. Capitol

Enlarge Photo

Diesel-powered trucks, buses, and construction equipment made before 2007 are some of the highest-emission vehicles in use. Many of them have their engines running constantly during the day, and their emissions are essentially uncontrolled.

The retrofits are considered highly cost-effective, with EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson admitting that every dollar spent eliminates $12 to $13 in future public-health costs. The funds reimburse local governments for costs they incur fitting better emissions-control equipment to those vehicles.

Jackson called the cuts "one of the tough decisions we had to make," though $100 million in funding for the retrofits through the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act currently remains to be spent.

President Obama inspects the 2011 Chevrolet Volt

President Obama inspects the 2011 Chevrolet Volt

Enlarge Photo

Obama's budget also zeroes out the Department of Energy's hydrogen fuel-cell research budget, which received 2010 funding of $49 million. As automakers switched focus from fuel cells to plug-in vehicles, the Government had reduced its commitment to that research from a 2006 high of $84 million.

The world's automakers plan to build more than 300,000 plug-in vehicles during the 2013 model year, including the Nissan Leaf and the Chevrolet Volt. But production of hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles that same year will be measurable in the dozens--at most perhaps in the hundreds.

Putting 1 million plug-in vehicles on U.S. roads by 2015 has been a consistent theme both of Obama's 2008 campaign for president and his Administration's policies. He reiterated that goal in his January State of the Union address.

[Bloomberg]

+++++++++++

Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (3)
  1. The fuel cell subsidies are no doubt among the greatest scams perpetrated on the US (and many other countries') taxpayer. Funded to the sum of 1.2 billion dollars during the Bush administration, Steven Chu tried to axe the funding of this dud for 2010 because: "fuel cells are still too far off to be an immediate priority for funding. Right now, the way we get hydrogen primarily is from reforming gas. That's not an ideal source of hydrogen...The other problem is, if it's for transportation, we don't have a good storage mechanism yet. What else? The fuel cells aren't there yet, and the distribution infrastructure isn't there yet. In order to get significant deployment, you need four significant technological breakthroughs. If you need four miracles, that's unlikely. Saints only need three miracles."
    Didn't happen though; Congress reinstated most of it and since a substantial part of the funding is no doubt spent on lobbyists it will most likely be reinstated again now. The hydrogen hoax will live on...
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. And that's how they went to the moon ....
    My goodness, it's not hopeless, but it is really, really bad. America is not only not moving forward, we are taking 3 steps back for every two steps forward. Wait ... which two steps?!?!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. The original Diesel engine ran on peanut oil. Imagine what a different world we would have had that fuel not been replaced by petroleum. A step back to that technology would solve many of our problems and provide thousands of agricultural and industrial jobs.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Get great deals on the 2012 Chevrolet Volt!
By clicking above, you agree that your data will be subject to our Car Quotes Privacy Policy
Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2013 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.