Advertisement

Range Rover Decides Hybrids Make Most Sense For Gas Guzzlers

 
Follow John

2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

2012 Range Rover Evoque

2012 Range Rover Evoque

Enlarge Photo

The 2012 Range Rover Evoque--the stylish new baby "soft-roader" that's Land Rover's smallest-ever luxury vehicle--will not be offered with a hybrid-electric version to improve its gas mileage.

That's the word from John Edwards, Land Rover's global brand director, who noted that in Europe, the Evoque will come with a 2.2-liter diesel engine that delivers 42 miles per gallon on the European test cycle.

And that was the goal set for the original Land Rover LRX concept when it debuted at Kensington Palace in June, complete with an appearance by Victoria "Posh Spice" Beckham.


Weight penalty

Instead, Edwards said, the company's first hybrid-electric vehicles will be versions of the larger Land-Rover LR4 (sold in the U.K. as the Discovery) and the larger Range Rovers, most likely including the Range Rover Sport that shares the LR4's platform.

Indeed, there's considerable logic to applying hybrid drive to your largest and least efficient vehicles. Edwards noted that the weight penalty of a hybrid system was greater in a smaller vehicle like the Evoque than in larger sport utilities.

Gallery: Land Rover LRX Concept

Gallery: Land Rover LRX Concept

Enlarge Photo

Wealthier buyers

For another thing, buyers of the toniest Range Rover models can better afford the higher price of a model that comes with the added cost of a battery pack, one or more electric motor-generators, and the associated electronics.

That's been the experience at General Motors, where the Cadillac Escalade Hybrid model takes a higher percentage of overall Escalade sales (roughly a quarter) than comparable hybrid versions of its cheaper, more basic Chevrolet Tahoe and GMC Yukon full-size sport utility vehicles.

2009 Cadillac Escalade Hybrid

2009 Cadillac Escalade Hybrid

Enlarge Photo

Doing the most good

And finally, many more gallons of gasoline are saved by making low-mileage vehicles more efficient than by doing the same in more economical vehicles. As we regularly note, miles-per-gallon is not a linear scale, although two-thirds of U.S. drivers surveyed don't understand that fact.

But over any mileage you care to choose, improving a 10-mpg vehicle to 20 mpg saves you fully five times the gasoline that replacing a 33-mpg vehicle with one that gets 50 mpg would.

Limits on carbon and MPG

Jaguar Land Rover, like all other carmakers, is looking at having to meet vastly tougher regulations on gas mileage (in North America) and carbon emissions (in Europe and Asia) if it is to continue selling the large, luxurious all-wheel-drive vehicles that made its reputation (and most likely the bulk of its profits).

Which means that we should expect to see a hybrid Land Rover LR4 or Range Rover Discovery around 2013, probably as a 2014 model.

So will we be able to get that 42-mpg diesel Evoque here in the States? Errrrr ... no.

The only engine offered in the U.S. for the 2012 Range Rover Evoque will be a 240-horsepower turbocharged 2.0-liter four, mated to a six-speed automatic transmission and full-time all-wheel-drive.

Though, to be fair, that engine (don't call it a Ford EcoBoost!) should do pretty well on the MPGs itself.

[AutoExpress via Motor Authority]





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (5)
  1. AHEM.... FORD ECOBOOST. I went there :D
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Why on Earth we Americans do not get the high mileage diesels is a mystery. 42MPG for an Evoque? They'd sell a whole bunch more in the USA if we could see mileage like that!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. @Richard Shanks: Here's a perspective on why we don't get those high-mileage diesels:
    http://www.greencarreports.com/blog/1039689_why-cant-we-buy-small-european-diesels-in-the-u-s
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. Once again John Voelcker present false logic against hybrids.
    1) The cited survey about Americans not understanding MPG does not prove what Mr. Voelcker says it proves. People understand how much money they spend on gasoline no matter what Mr. Voelcker says about it.
    2) A false choice is presented by Mr. Voelcker suggesting that certain people need to drive to the store to get milk in a 10 MPG vehicle and the world would be a better place if that was a 20 MPG vehicle. Wrong, the world would be a better place if they used a 50 MPG vehicle.
    3) Once again, only the highway figure is used for discussion. If an individual only drives on the highway, then fine. However, for many people much of their driving is done in the city at low speed and the fuel efficiency of a hybrid is dramatically better even an efficient diesel. EPA estimates that 45% of all driving is city driving. Mr. Voelcker estimates that it should be ignored in these discussion.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. One more thing to say about hybrids in large vehicles. If logic dictates that hybrids make the most sense for larger vehicles, why is the most successful hybrid actually a smaller vehicle (the Prius).
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Get great deals on the 2012 Cadillac Escalade Hybrid!
By clicking above, you agree that your data will be subject to our Car Quotes Privacy Policy
Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2013 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.