Compact cars are pretty much a known quantity, and hence easy to visualize. Many are headed for 40-mpg highway ratings, and Hyundai recently threw down the gauntlet in saying it would start to report sales of 40-mpg vehicles--and challenged other makers to do the same.
Imagine a compact car,and what do you see? Probably the newest or highest-volume vehicles in the class: Toyota Corolla, Honda Civic, the new 2011 Chevrolet Cruze or Hyundai Elantra, or the upcoming 2012 Ford Focus.
We're betting you don't see a 5,771-pound two-door car, more than 18 feet long, producing 453 horsepower from its 6.75-liter V-12 engine and returning a dismal 11 mpg city, 18 mpg highway for a combined mileage rating of just 14 mpg.
Right?
Nonetheless, it turns out that through its own arcane system of defining car classes, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency considers the 2011 Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe to be a compact car.
That's the class of car, it says, that offers from 100 to 109 cubic feet of interior volume for cargo and passengers combined.
Even more bizarre: The 2011 Bentley Continental GTC, which weighs 100 pounds less but offers 100 more horsepower from a 6.0-liter turbocharged W-12, is considered a subcompact (from 85 to 100 cubic feet).
Its mileage ratings are identical--11 mpg city, 18 mpg highway--though its combined rating is 1 mpg lower, at a mere 13 mpg.
If you own one of these undeniably luxurious, fast conveyances, and acquaintances ask what you drive, just say, "Oh, a little British compact car."
They'll never even ask about your mileage. Not, perhaps, that you may be overly concerned about such things.
[NYT Wheels Blog via Motor Authority]
Have an opinion?
This article is just pointing out the idiocy of the EPA's rating systems.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!