Advertisement

Subaru Unveils More Efficient Four-Cylinder Boxer Engine

 
Follow Viknesh

Third-generation Subaru four-cylinder boxer engine

Third-generation Subaru four-cylinder boxer engine

Enlarge Photo

Subaru is sticking to its almost trademark horizontally opposed or ‘boxer’ engine for its future lineup of cars, improving on the design, making it more refined and fuel efficient with each generation. The third and latest generation of the engine--the first major redesign in 21 years--has now been revealed and is scheduled to debut in the 2011 Forester towards the end of the year before filtering across to other models in the automaker’s lineup.

The engine is almost entirely new, starting from the basic structure, yet it maintains all the advantages of the horizontally-opposed layout: lightweight, compact, low center of gravity, and superior vibration balance.

Peak output stands at 146 horsepower and 145 pound-feet of torque.

The key difference between the new engine and previous designs is the environmental factor; it is roughly 10 percent more fuel efficient than the four-cylinder unit it replaces in Subaru’s lineup. Improved fuel efficiency has been achieved through optimization of intake port configuration and the addition of partitions inside ports, the use of TGV (Tumble Generated Valve), and the use of an EGR (Exhaust Gas Recirculation) cooler. Furthermore, Subaru has designed the new engine with consideration of the technology’s expandability and potential capability to receive further upgrades meeting future environmental measures.

The engine displaces either 2.0- or 2.5-liters and can be matched with either a manual or continuously variable transmission. Production will take place at Subaru’s new Gunma Oizumi plant in Japan.

[Subaru]





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (7)
  1. here in vancouver canada gas costs $5 /gallon. i used to drive subarus but theyre just gas guzzlers. This generation of subarus are disappointing especially the imprezas because theyre just plain ugly. the outback is a boat and the forester, and most of the lineup just guzzles gas.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Yikers, your definition of a guzzler is very questionable. I bought a new 2010 Forester last March and I'm consistently getting 27 MPG for combined city/highway driving. I can get up to 32 MPG for long highway trips. Prior to this car, I had a 1999 Forester that got 22 MPG.
    While that's not great compared to something like a Prius, I think it's a reasonable trade-off for the increased utility, AWD safety, and fun of driving with a manual transmission.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. Most of the line-up guzzles gas compare with what? They are the most fuel efficient AWD line-up in North America. Your dislikes of the new bodystyles is completely subjective as well.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. I have a 1993 Honda Civic that just got 43 mpg on a trip from Spokane to Seattle. Yes, that is over the Cascade Mountains. No, it is not an AWD, but it IS 17 years old! It's only apples and oranges if you are using it for different purposes.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. I have to agree, Subaru's are ridiculously inefficient for a small car. The best manual Subaru's get 20/27 MPG (city/hwy).
    This doesn't even match the current CAFE standard of 27.5 MPG never mind the 2016 standard of 35.5 MPG.
    AWD Safety? I hope you mean security, like security blanket, like something that you think helps you but it really doesn't. AWD kills gas mileage all the time for a feature that is almost never used. It is right up the with 0-60 acceleration times as an overhyped feature.
    Civic 26/34 MPG
    Corolla 26/35 MPG
    Oh yes Prius 51/48 MPG.
    Compared to similarly sized
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. Oh, so 10% more efficient means
    22/30 MPG city/hwy?
    That's just horrible for a car of this size.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. Mr. Briggs, I guess in the context of using a Subaru AWD in the US, or in a warmer region, makes it inadequate. But, in a colder area, AWD and 4WD matters. Thus, 10% increased in fuel efficiency has a great effect. Subaru also have more efficient vehicles which are not available in North America, such as their boxer diesel engine. This news is meant for Subaru enthusiasts man, you're barking at the wrong tree. Yes, the other competitors have a greater mileage, but its a miss-match if you're comparing the Subaru to its competitors wholly by mileage because of its AWD capabilities. besides, if Subaru starts making 2WD with better mileage, it really defeats the purpose f branding it a Subaru. This is not just any car my friend, its a Subaru. if you really want less fuel consumption or none at all, drive a smart car or a bicycle, its good for everyone's health as well.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2013 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.