Advertisement

Innovative Cambered Tire Helps Saves Fuel, Boost Handling

 
Follow Viknesh

Innovative CamberTire

Innovative CamberTire

Enlarge Photo

We already know that it’s possible to curb your fuel consumption just by having your tires properly inflated, or better yet, installing a set of low rolling-resistance tires, however, soon there may be an additional avenue to look at when picking the most fuel efficient rubber for your ride.

The answer is the camber of your tires, more specifically, the negative camber. This is when the tops of your car’s tires are angled inwards towards the chassis.


Racing cars typically feature negative cambered tires as they improve grip when cornering due to the tire being at a more optimal angle to the road, transmitting the forces through the vertical plane of the tire, rather than through a shear force across it. Another benefit is the increase contact area with the road, also when cornering.

Of course, there are negative effects too--namely increased tire wear and impaired ride quality--which is why production cars almost always have zero camber. However, a car enthusiast by the name of John Scott has devised a special tire dubbed the CamberTire that is claimed to negate the increase wear and ride penalties normally associated with cambered tires.

Scott first got the idea after seeing a heavily laden Lexus vehicle with its rear tires steeply cambered. In 1999 he filed a patent for a “tire with a constantly decreasing diameter” and the CamberTire was born. Prototypes of Scott’s CamberTire on a Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution GSR test vehicle have shown to have shorter stopping distances, higher cornering speeds, improved ride and even improved fuel economy.

The key to his design is an asymmetrical tire mold that yields an outer sidewall slightly taller than the inner sidewall. The wheel alignment must be adjusted to provide at least three degrees of negative camber.

Scott is now working closely with a number of firms, including motorsports tire distributor M&H Racemaster, to further develop the CamberTire.

[The New York Times]





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (7)
  1. You may want to check your facts, the reason why manufacturers run zero camber is not due to tire wear or ride comfort.
    Running zero (or near zero) camber is due to liability mostly. It is commonly accepted that the average driver can recover from understeer much more reliably that recover from oversteer. In a situation where the driver is going to hit an object (like a tree), it is much safer to impact the front of the car instead of the side.
    It is a myth that increased camber causes accelerated tire wear. Most people who want a race car "feel" and increase camber, don't adjust toe or the caster rate to match the new angle of the tires. Improperly set toe is what wears tires. Also, people who usually run a fair amount of negative camber usually want the car the handle properly, so they will usually change the shocks and springs out to something more aggressive. The decrease in ride comfort is due to the mechanical aspect of the equipment, not the alignment of the tires.
    What increased camber will do, though, is lengthen the stopping distance of the car, since less of the tire is in contact with the road while doing down the road in a straight line. Race cars have to deal with this too, which is why increasing negative camber is always a trade off with acceleration and braking performance.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Not a new idea. The BFG R1 race tires I was using in the late '90's had a built-in camber effect too (designed for cars in classes where mechanically adjusting the camber was not permitted).
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. The camber effect is basically lowering the ride height of the car. Not sure the better stopping and all are also fitting in with better fuel economy on the same tire. The fuel economy would fit in if when driving in a straight line there was less tire in contact with the ground, which would impact tire wear.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. This is a retarded idea. These wheels are is conical, the idea being to compensate for camber so that the tire has an even contact patch with the ground when the suspension is cambered. But a cone does not roll in a straight line! Conical wheels will always want to roll in a curve, which means that when you drive straight, you are actually going in a curve relative to where the wheels want to go. This will cause wear and extra fuel use. It's like having misaligned wheels.
    Camber is used to stabilize a car around corners. It has nothing to do with fuel economy. Aggressive driving and taking corners as fast as possible is antithetical to fuel economy.
    Well-designed suspensions manage the camber of a wheel when the suspension spring is compressed during cornering and weight is transferred to that side of the car. In particular, a double-wishbone design will keep the camber about the same so that the wheel has decent contact whether traveling straight or taking a curve. In other words, there is no requirement for a tire shape to compensate for anything during cornering: this is the job of the suspension.
    In a passenger car designed for economic A to B driving, you want next to no camber, and cylindrical wheels which roll straight.
    It's possible that there may be some value in the conical wheels for racing application. But what does that have to do with fuel economy?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. Interesting idea. One monkey wrench in this is the requirement to use camber plates. Most (if not all) modern cars have fixed camber, generally at around 0.5-1.0 degree negative. The tires require -3.0 to work correctly. In my experience camber plates are not street friendly, they tend to rattle, sometimes loudly over slight bumps or imperfections, and they remove the rubber bushing which absorbs quite a bit of noise and vibration. If this tire is designed for the track crowd, who knows, it might be a winner, but I can't see a general application unless CamberTire gets manufacturers to integrate such a design.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. Hi, I am not a professional driver, but have been in the tire business for many years. Contrary to the negative comments posted regarding Camber Tires. I was in Los Angeles recently and had the opportunity to drive and Evo equiped with Camber Tires. I found that the way the tire is molded with built in Camber that the tire makes contact with the road at all times and does not lose any of its contact patch, making it a much safer tire than standard tires that do lose some contact with the raod when cornering. The car drove straight down the road with no pull in either direction and stopping distance was much improved on ths car because the tires did not lose contact with the road surface. I drove the same car equipped with standard tires and the difference was night and day. I am very impressed with this tire and can't wait to have them on my personal cars. Before making any comments positive or negative you should drive a car with these tires and see for yourself. You will change your mind just like I did.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. thanks for sharing this
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2013 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.