With the increase in coverage that electric cars are enjoying in both the motoring and the mainstream press, you might be forgiven for thinking that the future is bright for EV lovers worldwide.
The U.K. newspaper The Telegraph might have you believe otherwise, though.
According to a recent article, a study reveals that a fuel tax of 10p a mile (15 cents) would have to be added to the cost of electricity to cover the extra demand that an increase in electic cars would place on the UK's National Grid.
The study, released by analysists Saturn Energy, also claims that electricity for recharging vehicles should cost the same as petrol. The average price of gas in the UK at the moment is £1.18 per liter, or almost $7 per gallon. This massive price hike would be "to deter those motorists who are shifting to electric cars to try to save money on driving".
The extra revenue generated, up to $2.5 billion a year, could pay for one new nuclear power plant, two gas-fired power stations or up to 10,000 new wind turbines per year.
Saturn Energy's managing director, John McShane, argues that "The running costs of an electric car, if you can afford one, looks attractive. Two pence per mile compared with say 12p for a conventional car."
"But putting a million on the road," McShane continues, "will mean having to build new power stations to keep them charged when we’re already concerned about power shortages."
McShane also adds that, while he agrees heavy taxes would cut the incentives for people buying electric cars, “we can’t cut emissions without making sure that we can keep the lights on in our homes and businesses.”
While few studies appear to exist on the impact of electric vehicles on the U.K. electricity grid, that topic was extensively studied for the U.S. by the Electric Power Research Industry and the National Resources Defense Council.
Their joint report, issued in 2008, concluded that a steady rollout of plug-in vehicles would have very little effect on grid capacity. One plug-in vehicle has the same grid load as four plasma TVs, and their steady spread has hardly caused calls for new and punitive taxes.
It may or may not come as a surprise that Saturn Energy deals largely in commercial gas and electricity, and wouldn't stand to make much profit from an increase in electric car usage.
A contract to produce more power stations, however, could be very much in their corporate interest.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
By ev enthusiast Posted: 7/8/2010 7:41am PDT
do gas cars have taxes on gas for the cost of our wars ? how about the cost of our increased health problems ? etc. etc.
if we added all these costs, gas would be a hundred dollars a gallon.
one thing i have learned about "studies" is that they always benefit the entity that is paying for it. for the most part, they are nothing but glorified advertisement.
To price the electricity at the same level as gas is verging on robbery.
By Desertstraw Posted: 7/8/2010 8:52am PDT
By Eletruk Posted: 7/8/2010 9:36am PDT
The bigger isue is how to have electric vehicles pay road tax. For the short turn future, the impact of EVs not paying road taxes is negligible, but if there is widespread adoption, a means of collecting miles traveled road tax needs to be incorporated.
By egmarshall Posted: 7/8/2010 10:04am PDT
What utter nonsense, the grid can charge millions of EVs at night, and wind/solar with smart chargers can handle the rest.
Need more generation? Feed-in-Tariffs (ie. Germany & Ontario) work very well to encourage private renewable energy development (rather than taxes).
By Alex Posted: 7/8/2010 1:55pm PDT
This is BULL SHIT.
And in fact who the hell will charge on charge station for 700-1000% more expensive electricity???
I'll charge at home or at works solar panels :)
By Roy H Posted: 7/8/2010 10:53pm PDT
Much better to build a far superior and cheaper reactor, LFTRs. Liquid Flouride Thorium Reactors were invented in the 1960s at Oak Ridge National Laboratory USA. They ran one for almost 5 years. LFTRs use cheap thorium, are inherently safe, do not produce long term radio-active waste and were abandoned because they are not suitable for making bombs. See:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWUeBSoEnRk
and
http://energyfromthorium.com/
Although the principles are prooven, there is still some research required for the best materials to have long 50 year plus life. This should be the highest priority to solve our energy and pollution problems.
Electricity would be lower in cost, and thorium is available world wide, no country would have to import it.
By ev enthusiast Posted: 7/9/2010 7:31am PDT
By ev enthusiast Posted: 7/9/2010 9:27pm PDT
what they arent saying is that THE MAIN REASON they are installing them is that they will enventually start charging different rates for time of use, thereby ENCOURAGING us to charge our cars at night.
By ev enthusiast Posted: 7/11/2010 9:23pm PDT
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!