Electric Cars Must Pay Higher Taxes To Build Power Plants, Says Power-Plant Builder

 
Follow Antony

With the increase in coverage that electric cars are enjoying in both the motoring and the mainstream press, you might be forgiven for thinking that the future is bright for EV lovers worldwide.

The U.K. newspaper The Telegraph might have you believe otherwise, though.

According to a recent article, a study reveals that a fuel tax of 10p a mile (15 cents) would have to be added to the cost of electricity to cover the extra demand that an increase in electic cars would place on the UK's National Grid.

The study, released by analysists Saturn Energy, also claims that electricity for recharging vehicles should cost the same as petrol. The average price of gas in the UK at the moment is £1.18 per liter, or almost $7 per gallon. This massive price hike would be "to deter those motorists who are shifting to electric cars to try to save money on driving".

The extra revenue generated, up to $2.5 billion a year, could pay for one new nuclear power plant, two gas-fired power stations or up to 10,000 new wind turbines per year.

Saturn Energy's managing director, John McShane, argues that "The running costs of an electric car, if you can afford one, looks attractive. Two pence per mile compared with say 12p for a conventional car."

"But putting a million on the road," McShane continues, "will mean having to build new power stations to keep them charged when we’re already concerned about power shortages."

McShane also adds that, while he agrees heavy taxes would cut the incentives for people buying electric cars, “we can’t cut emissions without making sure that we can keep the lights on in our homes and businesses.”

While few studies appear to exist on the impact of electric vehicles on the U.K. electricity grid, that topic was extensively studied for the U.S. by the Electric Power Research Industry and the National Resources Defense Council.

Their joint report, issued in 2008, concluded that a steady rollout of plug-in vehicles would have very little effect on grid capacity. One plug-in vehicle has the same grid load as four plasma TVs, and their steady spread has hardly caused calls for new and punitive taxes.

It may or may not come as a surprise that Saturn Energy deals largely in commercial gas and electricity, and wouldn't stand to make much profit from an increase in electric car usage.

A contract to produce more power stations, however, could be very much in their corporate interest.

[Telegraph]





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (13)
  1. from everything that i have read, the problem our power companies have is max power. if charged at night, it should not create a problem.
    do gas cars have taxes on gas for the cost of our wars ? how about the cost of our increased health problems ? etc. etc.
    if we added all these costs, gas would be a hundred dollars a gallon.
    one thing i have learned about "studies" is that they always benefit the entity that is paying for it. for the most part, they are nothing but glorified advertisement.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. I agree, and that's essentially the problem with the study mentioned. The company would stand little to gain from the sale of electric vehicles as for the most part they wouldn't be providing the power for them - but they'd gain immensely from being given the contract to build new power stations.
    To price the electricity at the same level as gas is verging on robbery.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. This article is not relevant to the U.S. Unless we are utterly stupid, we will switch to renewable energy, especially solar power. As I remember it, an area of 100 by 100 miles of otherwise unused land in Arizona will meet all the electrical energy needs of the whole country. Wind, geothermal, and ocean power are all renewable and available in different parts of this country. Only shear stupidity or very dirty politics can prevent energy from becoming cheap and abundant.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. It astounds me the level of entitlement these utilities feel. In a free market society, you must provide products or services at competitive prices, or go out of business. So rather than compete fairly, they want the government to tilt the board in their favor. They are essentially asking for a government subsidy for something that doesn't need subsidizing.
    The bigger isue is how to have electric vehicles pay road tax. For the short turn future, the impact of EVs not paying road taxes is negligible, but if there is widespread adoption, a means of collecting miles traveled road tax needs to be incorporated.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. Does this guy work for an oil company?
    What utter nonsense, the grid can charge millions of EVs at night, and wind/solar with smart chargers can handle the rest.
    Need more generation? Feed-in-Tariffs (ie. Germany & Ontario) work very well to encourage private renewable energy development (rather than taxes).
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. @Desertstraw I recall hearing somewhere about the Arizona plan you mention. However, I posted the article for general interest - and I certainly wouldn't put it past "sheer stupidity or very dirty politics" in the U.S. or elsewhere resulting in a situation such as that above.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. So .. at night they will waste energy (when You are actually charging Your car.)
    This is BULL SHIT.
    And in fact who the hell will charge on charge station for 700-1000% more expensive electricity???
    I'll charge at home or at works solar panels :)
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. Absolutely incredible the balls these guys have to ask for such a handout and suggest that EV sales should be stopped.
    Much better to build a far superior and cheaper reactor, LFTRs. Liquid Flouride Thorium Reactors were invented in the 1960s at Oak Ridge National Laboratory USA. They ran one for almost 5 years. LFTRs use cheap thorium, are inherently safe, do not produce long term radio-active waste and were abandoned because they are not suitable for making bombs. See:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWUeBSoEnRk
    and
    http://energyfromthorium.com/
    Although the principles are prooven, there is still some research required for the best materials to have long 50 year plus life. This should be the highest priority to solve our energy and pollution problems.
    Electricity would be lower in cost, and thorium is available world wide, no country would have to import it.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. @Roy H - thanks for the links and the information, I'll have a good look at them when I get a moment. I agree though, it's ridiculous them expecting electricity to be taxed so heavily. The quote that annoyed me the most was that about deterring motorists from trying to save money. It basically shows that some people don't want cars to be about regardless of how clean they are.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  10. must be people who own lots of shares in the oil companies - LOL !!!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  11. i am one of 5.3 million - LOL. click my name and the smart meter link should appear.
    what they arent saying is that THE MAIN REASON they are installing them is that they will enventually start charging different rates for time of use, thereby ENCOURAGING us to charge our cars at night.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  12. The real issue isn't the extra money needed to generate electricity, the real issue is the tax money lost as millions of cars go Electric. That has the Politians loosing sleep, not where they get the power.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  13. now that is the best reason so far to go ev - mess up the politicians - LOL.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Find Green Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.