We've covered the 2013 Chevrolet Spark a couple of times before, but now there's a drive report of the European version, courtesy of Motor Trend. We're not entirely sure we agree with their conclusion, though.
Granted, the Spark is the smallest Chevy ever. But Motor Trend winds up its road test with the assertion that the Spark won't be a major factor in the U.S. market because it's just too small.
12 feet long, give or take
Well, how small is it? The hatchback Spark is tall for its 143-inch length, to permit four six-foot people to fit inside. You can assume the U.S. version will be 12 feet long, give or take an inch.
That's an inch shorter than the 2010 Mini Cooper, which has a back seat that's really not suitable for adult humans, but a full three feet longer than the two-seat 2010 Smart ForTwo.
Smaller than subcompact
As the magazine points out, the Spark doesn't compete with the (154-inch-long) 2011 Ford Fiesta, which will join the 2010 Honda Fit and a raft of other subcompacts in appealing to the college-student and first-car markets.
Instead, it's half a size smaller than that, and smaller than the current 2010 Chevrolet Aveo, at 170 inches, which will be replaced with a redesigned model in 2012.
Smart styling
To keep the proportions right, some models sit on 15-inch wheels, larger than those of many competitors. The front has the traditional Chevy grille, with its horizontal split, and the rear sports round Chevy taillights.
Inside, a "motorcycle like" instrument cluster is mounted on the steering column. Stylish, sure, but also perhaps a way to make it cheaper and easier to build right- and left-hand-drive versions without major changes.
Peppy but noisy
For European and Asian markets, the Spark offers either a 1.0-liter or 1.2-liter four-cylinder engine. Motor Trend tested the larger of the two, with a five-speed manual transmission, and found it peppy enough but very noisy--which Chevrolet engineers said would be fixed before U.S. sales.
Fuel efficiency may well surpass 30 mpg in the city, and 40 mpg on highways. But the magazine concludes that the Spark "won't sell many units in the States," and hence can't help GM much with its corporate fuel efficiency.
Why? "It's simply too small to make it onto most buyers' radar."
Tell me the price of gas in 2012
We can make the case for either side of the argument. If gas stays cheap (below $3/gallon), that assessment may be accurate.
But if it spikes more than $4 a gallon, some buyers are likely to expand their horizons. Perhaps some will conclude that a four-seat, four-door car that's fun to drive just might be possible despite its limited length.
What do you think? Would YOU buy a 12-foot-long car if it fit four people? Leave us your comments, below.
Have an opinion?
evchels Posted: 12/7/2009 10:30am PST
DGA Posted: 12/7/2009 12:27pm PST
minicarlover Posted: 12/7/2009 5:50pm PST
Better yet, they should kick it up a notch and add a diesel engine to the lineup. That's what is missing in the US, a SMALL car with a diesel capable of 65+mpg.
pissed off Posted: 12/7/2009 7:00pm PST
Cletus Posted: 12/8/2009 9:08am PST
Matt Posted: 12/8/2009 9:08am PST
webwalker Posted: 12/8/2009 9:31am PST
benjamin Posted: 12/8/2009 12:05pm PST
Noel Park Posted: 12/24/2009 11:27am PST
Ryan Posted: 4/18/2010 11:17pm PDT
Matthew Posted: 4/19/2010 11:30am PDT
GM Better sell the Chevy Spark here in the States if they want to stay competitive and not lose market share.
Rick Posted: 1/23/2011 7:49am PST
Athlor Posted: 2/11/2011 1:09pm PST
It likely only has one or two airbags (most new cars have 6 to 10), and it probably doesn't meet current side-impact, roof-crush, and various other safety standards. The added vehicle size and weight to provide all of these items has some impact on the mileage.
I think it's highly unlikely that carmakers would find a receptive audience if they were to say, "Hey, we can give you better mileage! Just let us make cars that are far less safe, and pollute more as well .. "
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!