Advertisement

Is The International Energy Agency Lying About Oil Reserves?

 

Offshore Oil Rig

Offshore Oil Rig

Enlarge Photo

Related Photo Galleries


See more photos »

According to a report in The Guardian, a whistle-blower at the International Energy Agency (IEA) claims that it is purposefully publishing misleading figures about the world's remaining oil reserves. A senior official, who asked not to be named, says the IEA is inflating its projections for fear of triggering panic buying and a worldwide financial meltdown. The source says the United States has encouraged the IEA to exaggerate the possibilities of finding new oil sources, while downplaying the diminishing returns from existing oil fields.

While the IEA's World Energy Outlook reports that production can increase from the current level of 83 million barrels per day to 105 million barrels per day, many analysts disagree. Some believe that we've already seen the world's peak oil production and that even an 8% increase from today's production levels would be unsustainable. This isn't the first time the IEA's assertions have been questioned, but sources say that the IEA's chief economist, Fatih Birol, is facing increased pressure from within his own organization to defend his numbers.


"The IEA in 2005 was predicting oil supplies could rise as high as 120m barrels a day by 2030 although it was forced to reduce this gradually to 116m and then 105m last year. The 120m figure always was nonsense but even today's number is much higher than can be justified and the IEA knows this, " says the insider.

The IEA was formed after the oil crisis in 1974 to help protect western nations from another energy emergency. Now one wonders if the agency is blinding the countries it's supposed to be helping to the reality of a world with dwindling oil reserves.

Source: The Guardian





 
Follow Us

People Who Read This Article Also Read

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (7)
  1. Quite the news! A unattributed story is meaningless.
    Yesterday my gardener told me that the reserves were twice what is claimed. At least that is attributed to allow one to determine the probability of accuracy.
    I think the Guardian reporter needed to write something so he did - pure garbage without a source or something to back it up.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. It is quite an uncertain figure that is given by the IEA. In contrast to the current production levels, an increase of 20 million barrels per day could be made. This numbers are sure to create questions that, at this stage of scarcity of oil reserves how could it be possible?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. Russ, the story's not unattributed, it's attributed to an unidentified source, which is not unusual when reporting on a sensitive topic. I agree, however, that this is not new news. It's long been known that oil predictions are unreliable, since they are based in part on speculation and in part on unverified data from secretive oil producing nations. The fact that these guesses may have been biased in an optimistic direction by US influence is really no big surprise, and in fact not particularly disturbing or scandalous. In my opinion it is short-sighted and unfortunate policy, but so long as we don't have access to concrete data there's not much that can be done about it.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. I have read that production has dropped dramatically in the major oil fields in Iran and Mexico. I have also read that Mexico will soon become a net importer of oil.
    I am not sure how accurate these claims are, but it makes sense this would be happening and that the IEA would be glossing it over.
    If we have already seen peak oil production in the world, the good news is that we are finally developing electronic transportation. Otherwise, we would be screwed, like we were in the '70s.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. Bottom line is that even if the IEA is playing it straight and all of the information they base their assessments on are valid, and world production can get up to 105 MBD, we are still screwed. Since 1995 the world oil consumption has increased by 15MBD from about 70-85 MBD. Assuming the world can go up to 105 MBD, we have less than 15 years before the crap hits the fan. Remember, this is an exponentially increasing rate as the world population doubles about every 35 years and oil consumed per capita double in about that same amount of time.
    How many EVs will we have on the road in 15 years? Let's go crazy and say 20 million EVs. There will be about 1.5 billion gas only vehicles on the road by then.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. "In time of peace, prepare for war." I agree with all of you that, if we don't get ready in !@#$%^ short order, we are going to be royally screwed. It will make the '70s look like a tea party, IMHO.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. WW III is inevitable if population of the world is doubled, thats beyond the sustainability of the world...PREPARE!!!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2013 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.