Advertisement

Plug-In Advocates Target Toyota Over Climate Change, But Why?

 
Follow John

Photo on MoveOn.org: Toyota, Stop Opposing Clean Energy

Photo on MoveOn.org: Toyota, Stop Opposing Clean Energy

Enlarge Photo

Related Photo Galleries


See more photos »

Here at GreenCarReports.com, sometimes we get e-mails that make us scratch our heads.

For instance, why would advocacy group Plug In America target Toyota, which offers the popular 2010 Prius? Why would it slam the world's undisputed leader in hybrid-car development, the company that made two-thirds of the 2 million hybrids on the roads today?

Granted, Toyota has proceeded more slowly than other carmakers on plug-in vehicles. But it formally launched its Prius plug-in hybrid last month, and plans to release small volumes of that car to fleets before the end of the year. So what's the problem?


2010 Toyota Prius Plug-in Hybrid Concept

2010 Toyota Prius Plug-in Hybrid Concept

Enlarge Photo

Initial testing of Toyota’s plug-in hybrid system installed in the second-gen Prius has returned fuel-economy figures of 65mpg

Initial testing of Toyota’s plug-in hybrid system installed in the second-gen Prius has returned fuel-economy figures of 65mpg

Enlarge Photo

Toyota Prius plug-in hybrid

Toyota Prius plug-in hybrid

Enlarge Photo

2008 Prius Plug-in Hybrid prototype

2008 Prius Plug-in Hybrid prototype

Enlarge Photo

Chamber of Commerce vs climate change

Turns out that it's not really about hybrids. It's about efforts to address climate change, which the U.S. Chamber of Commerce opposes rather vigorously.

The Chamber recently commented on draft legislation on the issue in the Senate, saying it would drive up business costs, and it opposes U.S. Environmental Protection Agency efforts to regulate emissions of greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act.

Total destruction of the US? Really?

In fact, says the Chamber, greenhouse-gas regulations would be such "a job killer" that they would "completely shut the country down" and "virtually destroy the United States".

Gracious! It's that old end-of-civilization-as-we-know-it problem, again.

Exodus gathers steam

This might not all be so surprising except that a number of prominent global companies, including such global industrial stalwarts as General Electric, are vociferously and publicly protesting the Chamber's stance.

They say, in essence, that the science behind climate change is now accepted. They feel efforts to stall legislation only delay progress and add to their uncertainty in planning for a future in which lowering carbon emissions is just part of standard business activity.

Two large California utilities, Pacific Gas & Electric and Exelon, resigned their Chamber memberships entirely. So did Nike. Apple followed earlier this month.

Toyota owners, unite!

Plug In America is particularly irked at the Chamber's latest efforts, which it calls "a $100-million campaign to pour millions into killing clean energy via its lobbying efforts" that target both the Administration's energy bill and its health-care reform efforts.

The group has asked plug-in hybrid supporters--especially those who own Toyotas--to join an action staged by advocacy group MoveOn.org that urges the company to resign its Chamber of Commerce membership as a protest of these efforts.

Phase I: Owner, sign, make & model photo

The action page on MoveOn.org offers a sign template that Toyota owners can print out, saying, "Toyota: Stop Opposing Clean Energy".  It includes a space for the owner's name and the year and model of the Toyota they own.

More than 800 photos of owners who've made signs and photographed themselves can be found on MoveOn's Flickr page.

Phase II: Letters to the editor

Now, Plug In America has moved into a second phase. It has joined MoveOn's latest action, asking supporters to send letters to their local newspapers that urge Toyota to resign from the Chamber.

And, adds the plug-in group, writers should also demand that Toyota "stop stalling" on plug-in vehicles and "immediately commit" to putting a plug-in hybrid on sale to retail consumers.

Chamber remains intransigent

The Chamber of Commerce, however, is hardly backing away from its stance. In a confrontational letter last week,  COO David Chavern attributed the actions by PG&E, Nike, Apple and others to organizing by "our normal adversaries", including green groups.

The letter said the Chamber will continue to fight efforts to "force us to do things against the best interests of the business community," and cited its more than 3 million members among businesses large and small.

Strange bedfellows

So on one side, we have the Chamber of Commerce digging in its heels. On the other, we have grassroots plug-in hybrid advocates allying with some strange bedfellows, including global multinational corporations--albeit perhaps the more progressive members of that group.

Fasten your seat belts. This could be a bumpy ride.

[Plug In America, Guardian, Forbes, SFgate, and others; PHOTO: MoveOn.org]





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (6)
  1. Thanks for deconstructing this whole thing John, I was totally confused by the anti-Toyota signs. I still can't understand the U.S. Chamber of Commerce position on climate change, but I don't expect anyone to explain that one. A head in the sand is a head in the sand, there's just no reasoning with it.
    At least now I know what those Toyota signs are about...I guess it would not be as cool to walk around with signs saying "Please resign your Chamber of Commerce membership until it reverses its position on climate change."
    Stephen
     
    Post Reply
    -1
    Bad stuff?

     
  2. Amen, Chamber of Commerce were can I sign up! Their head may be in the sand but your head is in a part of your body. I got news for you CO2 is as natural as water! It is not a polutant so it can not be legality regulated by the EPA. The climate has been changing for 100,000's years, man has only been around for 15000 years. They did not creat climate change God did!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. This flap over the Chamber of Commerce is an unfortunate consequence of making science political. In your post, you said "the science of climate change is accepted." In all honesty, this is incorrect. Those of us who want a cleaner environment (I'm a Prius owner too) may want to believe that the case for carbon emissions has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, but it has not. (Neither was the "ozone hole" crisis of the last decade. Where did that crisis go, by the way?)
    Unfortunately there are those on both sides who would use an issue, especially a scary "end of the world" scenario, to push through legislation that is ideological instead of scientific. And that just may be happening in this case.
    If the Chamber of Commerce has an opinion that the legislation goes too far and makes it too expensive for business to exist, should they not express their opinion? I thought freedom of speech was what this country was all about.
    I think all viewpoints should be listened to and evaluated, not vilified. We need reasoned discourse in this country.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

     
  4. Amen brother!!!! I am an Electrical and Nuclear Engineer and I also drive a Prius. I can not stand illogical people, like the people on the Left who believe Free Speach only applies to them!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. @Joe B: Just to be clear, note that my phrase, "the science of climate change is accepted" refers to the point of view of the companies cited. It's a summary of their positions, which vary somewhat, but it is what they say at this point.
    Your argument is more properly directed at them than at the article itself, which was written to be neutral on the issue.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. John, I'm confused by your confusion. One the one hand Toyota has sold more (and better) hybrids than anyone else. Yet as they bask in the glow of the Prius they simultaneously build ever-larger and less efficient SUVs and pick-up trucks. Toyota supports the Chamber, which is so opposed to even minimal climate change legislation that large corporations such as Apple and PG&E have withdrawn.
    Although more than 10 years have passed since Toyota began producing all-electric RAV4s (ending in 2003) and I still drive one, they have taken a go slow approach to plug-in cars. Prodding automakers to move forward with proven plug-in technology rather than wringing the last dollar out of petroleum-fueled vehicles is what electric car advocates do. There are plenty of strange bedfellows to be found amongst EV and PHEV advocates - neo-cons and Greenpeace, for example - but Plug In America's support for MoveOn's campaign targeting Toyota can hardly be construed as a grass-roots organization's strange alliance with multi-national corporations.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2013 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.