Congress Passes Bill Classifying 3 Wheel Vehicles As Cars, Aptera 2e Qualifies For DOE Funding

 

Aptera 2e

Aptera 2e

Enlarge Photo

Updating a story we have been covering for awhile regarding three wheel vehicles and their classification as either cars or motorcycles, Congress has now voted and passed a bill that will classify 3 wheel vehicles such as the Aptera 2e as cars.  You can read previous articles by clicking here.

Congressional approval of the bill is the second to last step from becoming law.  The President must endorse the bill.  If approved by the President, and it is highly likely he will approve the bill,  the law will classify any enclosed, 3 wheel vehicle capable of carrying at least two people and returning 75 mpg as cars.  This will also make qualifying vehicles eligible for DOE funding.

The DOE will have to review previous applications for funding as the loans to companies such as Aptera were denied due to the 2e's previous classification as a motorcycle.  Now, with the 2e classified as a car, it becomes eligible for funding.  For Aptera, this is the breakthrough they were desperately seeking, but for makers of other 3 wheel vehicles, the additional safety requirements of vehicles classified as cars could put a hitch into their efforts to produce low priced, three wheel alternatives to traditional 4 wheel cars.

As Rep. Brian Bilbray, a co-sponsor of  the bill said, "This is a huge win for scientific innovation and the environment. We need more innovation and less regulation when it comes to promoting new ways to save energy while saving money at the pump."

Hopefully the bill's passage will benefit the numerous companies that make three wheel vehicles by providing them with access to much needed funding that was previously beyond their reach.

Source:  AutoBlogGreen





Posted in:
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (15)
  1. Great news ...these cars should be competive with the others ..I know idiots always bring the safety issue ..they dont woryy about safety when they drive recklessly or drive drunk or drive while texting or drive with one hand on the cell phone or drive while doing lipstic in the rear view mirror ..or not paying attention to the traffic ..or drive under the influenec of drugs ..US is full of such idiots ...:(
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Another step in the right direction. Could have been more / better, but will take improvements as the come.
    I still believe the safety requirements are counter-productive, but this is what happens when the government owns automakers and looks to protect their interests.
    Hopefully, they will add funding for two wheel vehicles.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. Alright, how much taxpayer money is Aptera going to get and why not when it flows off the presses like rain from the sky?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. good these things are death traps, and now they will be held to car safety standards.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. A step in the right direction. Yes, but it shouldn't have the qualification of gas milage. I know that was specifically put in to get other 2-wheel manufacturers off the hook, but why shouldn't they be required to produce safe vehicles also? I think the important issue is enclosed (must be up to safety standards) or open (lower standards), and number of wheels and gas milage should have nothing to do with it.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. Yet another article with wrong information. This bill says nothing about safety requirements. This is only for the DOE funding.
    The Aptera already meets car safety standards, but I don't know about the other 3-wheel vehicles.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. Will, exactly what data do YOU have that "these things" are death traps? Your imagination or something a bit more objective?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. This is great news, especially for those of us looking to vehicles like the Zap Alias and the Aptera to take the reins of the economical EV market. If they're classified as cars, they'll have to meet higher security standards, which will weed out the "death traps" (companies like Zap, though, have been designing for car safety standards since the beginning), and they'll also become eligible for more funding. It's a win-win.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. The aptera has been designed to meet or exceed all car safety standards. The thing took the weight of two elephants on the top of the car, and barely dented. It is modeled after the crash cage design of formula one racers, and the ovoid shape is inherently strong in and of itself. Whoever is calling it a death trap needs to pull their head out of their probably dilated anal sphincter.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  10. Excellent! Good work Rep. Bilbray. With apologies to Dr. Tagamet, "LJGTAWOTR!!" - all 3 of 'em, LOL.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  11. Well, this guy is still looking for ways to further develop what many already have labeled the best three-wheel vehicle concept that's around... It's called the Space-Efficient Vehicle.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  12. Does anyone have the bill number or link so I can see just what is says? This stinks if it means we have to DOT it as a car which costs about $10 million to do.
    TomS, please don't say a ZAP is safe as it's anything but, unstable and badly made.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  13. So why weren't they eligible for funding when classified as motorcycles? Pretty silly.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  14. The one very great advantage the three wheeled car had over the four wheeled car is that it was classified as a motorcycle and did not have to live up to all the very expensive safty standards set by the federal government, and therefore could be manufactured for a much lower cost. If this bill is passed it will destory the three wheeled car as a commercial product in America forever. Please Mr. President, do not sign this bill.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  15. As I have mentioned, the real advantage of the three wheeled car was low cost, but now that they have been classified as automobiles the low cost has been destroyed. Americans, in my opinion, are not going to buy a forty thousand dollar three wheel car. When three wheel cars become as expensive as four wheel cars, the American will buy the four wheel car. Three wheel cars have always been a hard sell anyway, and if they do not present a significant advantage people will not buy them in sufficient numbers to justify mass production.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Find Green Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.