Car Types
News by Car Type
Popular Green Cars
It's well known in the car industry that a diesel engine costs 10 to 20 percent more to build than a gasoline motor of equivalent output. That's because diesels have to be sturdier, and these days all US-bound diesels are fitted with turbochargers to boost their power.
Now a European executive has come right out and said it: Americans are going to have to pay more for diesels. And that's where we pause, because we're not convinced US buyers will pay the premium--especially for brands just launching diesel for the first time.
Europe: Much cheaper diesel
In Europe, where diesels take half the new car market, diesel fuel has been taxed far less heavily than gasoline for three decades now. At first, a few countries raised gas taxes to cut consumption after two oil crises, in 1973 and 1979, but kept diesel taxes lower to mollify truckers.
Now it's become regional economic policy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from all vehicles. That means that in Europe, a higher purchase price is offset by lower fuel consumption and cheaper fuel.
But in the States, diesel is roughly the same as gasoline, and it soared to prices as much as $1 per gallon higher than gasoline during the last price spike.

VWvortex reader Bajan2.0T snapped this shot of the badges on the 2010 Golf TDI that was displayed at the Toronto Auto Show.
Payback: Even more variables
This means that, unlike hybrids, which simply use less gasoline per mile than non-hybrids, the math to calculate diesel payback gets more complicated. Hybrids too are more expensive, but the only variable for calculating payback is the future price of gasoline.
Modern clean turbodiesels get unquestionably higher mileage. The 36 to 39 real-world miles per gallon achieved by two different journalists in 2009 Volkswagen Jetta TDI models is far higher than the gasoline Jetta. And diesel owners have long complained that today's clean diesels, including the Jetta, return much higher-than-EPA mileage figures in real-world use.
With that acknowledged, US buyers will have to work out whether a diesel's higher cost is offset by its better mileage--and to do so, they will have to make some big assumptions not only about future fuel costs, but also about the relationship of diesel to gas prices in the future.
Audi A3 TDI vs VW Golf TDI
We liked the European model of the Audi A3 TDI that we drove last spring, but its base price of $30,775 gives us pause. That's less than 10 percent more than the 2010 Audi A3 with the 1.8-liter gasoline engine, at $28,750. So we wonder if Audi is subsidizing its diesel to get a foothold in the market, just as Toyota is said to have done with the first several years of its Prius hybrid.
Note that the 2010 Volkswagen Golf TDI--which we've often said we think will be the big winner in small diesels--is priced at $21,990. That's a substantial $3,500, or about 20 percent, higher than the base 2010 Golf with a gasoline engine at $17,490. We suspect that's a more realistic premium.
A quarter of sales
Audi expects diesels to make up 20 to 25 percent of its US sales in time. So far, says Audi of America president Johan de Nysschen, the TDI model of the Q7 large sport utility represents 35 percent of the total, and the clean-diesel A3 an even higher share.
But neither of those translates into particularly high numbers. Through August, Audi has sold just 4,709 Q7s this year, and far fewer A3s: only 2,295. Both TDI models are for the 2010 model year, meaning we're likely only talking 2,000 diesel Audis in the US all year.
When Audi sells a quarter of its high-volume A4 sports sedan with diesels--meaning more than 10,000 a year--then we'll be getting somewhere.
But the warning, by no less a personage than Audi CEO Rupert Stadler, that Americans will have to pay higher premiums for our clean diesels makes us wonder whether large numbers of buyers will be willing to fork over that premium for a very unclear payback.
[Automotive News (subscription required) ]
Use the form below to send us a tip, give us feedback, or just say hello.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
By greg ellis Posted: 9/18/2009 11:54am PDT
By greg ellis Posted: 9/18/2009 5:19pm PDT
By JohnQPublic Posted: 9/18/2009 10:06pm PDT
I beg to differ. The Prius is mechanically a FAR simpler car than a diesel like the Jetta TDI.
The Power Split Device transmission in the Prius has just ONE planetary gearset with 22 moving parts, no clutch, no torque converter, no CVT belts, no gear-shifting wear and tear. The Jetta TDI tranny with the DSG gearbox has over 100+ moving parts with the automatic clutch.
The Jetta TDI's engine uses a turbocharger, which increases parts count and complexity. Prius engine is an atkinson-cycle engine that has no timing belt, no alternator, no starter motor or solenoid-- Less things to wear out and need replacement.
Mechanically, the Prius is the simpler car. All the complexity is in the software that runs the hybrid computer which balances the power output between the engine and electrical motor, and that software has worked fine for the past 12 years the Prius has been on the market. Unlike Microsoft Windows, you never see the Prius HSD software give you a blue-screen-of-death. :-D
That is why the Prius is MORE reliable than a diesel car and costs LESS to maintain.
By Car Repair Posted: 9/22/2009 1:41am PDT
By keith Posted: 9/22/2009 7:50pm PDT
By dfrw Posted: 9/27/2009 8:32am PDT
By gellis Posted: 9/28/2009 3:37pm PDT
By Uncle B Posted: 12/16/2009 1:04pm PST
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!