Should EVs Come With Batteries Included or Sold Separately?

 

Ford Focus EV - trunk mounted battery packs

Ford Focus EV - trunk mounted battery packs

Enlarge Photo

According to a recent study conducted by the University of California, Berkeley, 64% of upcoming EV sales will include the vehicle and the battery as stand alone products that are in a sense purchased separately.

The study suggests that there is a direct correlation between immediate adoption of EV technology and separate battery ownership.

Initially, consumers may be fearful of purchasing a $15,000 battery.  They may be inclined to believe that the technology is not proven, that the battery will suffer from durability or longevitiy issues, or that the vehicle they purchased will not suit their needs latter on and therefore are reluctant to purchase the battery as part of the vehicle costs.

Automakers have taken note of this study and many are following suit.  Nissan is undecided if the battery will be included in the purchase price of the LEAF, allowing for the possibility of leasing it as a stand alone product.  Other automakers have already decided to lease the battery separately.

Additionally, by not charging for the battery up front, the vehicle purchase price appears to drop significantly.  Consumers don't see the massive battery cost rolled into the price of the vehicle and therefore assume the vehicle is cheaper to purchase.  By not seeing an additional $15,000 in upfront costs, many buyers nearly forget about the price as it is rolled into a monthly lease payment.

The study suggests that as more consumers and early adopters report on the success of the battery technology, buyers will be more willing to pay for batteries upfront.  The study suggests that by keeping the battery as a stand alone option, buyers will see a price tag that is much more competitive with an internal combustion engine.

As time progresses and the battery technology is proven, many buyers will want ownership of the batteries possibly for uses after it has served duty in the vehicle.  At this time, automakers will likely switch over to include the battery as part of the vehicle price

Source:  Wards Auto (Login required)





Posted in:
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (8)
  1. Both business models should be tried. A battery lease may make better financial sense to businesses, while ownership may make more sense for individuals.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Both models should be tried but not at the same time. Currently in the Netherlands the Th!nk City is being sold with battery at a significant cost, 38 000 Euro... equivalent to around 54 000 USD... for a small two seater.
    Initially when the battery costs are high it would definitely be more attractive to lease the battery then once battery costs go down car companies can sell them together. (Source: http://www.zerauto.nl/blog/index.php/2009/03/23/think_city_nederland-elektrische_auto)
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. My fear is that at some point leasing batteries may become part of the EV business model. Note that the present ICE business model envisages an endless stream of secondary revenues from maintenance/part sales which will largely disappear in the case of EV's. Battery lease schemes may be abused to make up for that, even if battery cost drop. So please offer both possibilities to make battery cost transparent.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. I am sort of agnostic on this, as I can see the advantges both ways. I agree with Chris O at #3 that we need real transparency as to the cost both ways so that we can make informed decisions.
    No transparency = no sale!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. Here is the original article from Berkeley directly.
    http://cet.berkeley.edu/news/uc-berkeley-study-finds-separate-battery-ownership-accelerates-mass-market-adoption-of-electric-cars
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. Leasing the battery is a non-starter for me. Other than tax advantages for businesses, there are no advantages to leasing vehicle components, and may disadvantages.
    Once you buy an EV with a leased battery, you're locked into the battery lease contract. The contract would likely be written so that, if the technology improves, the leasor would see the benefit - not the consumer. Since the consumer has no benefit in caring for the battery, the running battery cost has to be higher to compensate for the abuse. And finally, if the leasing company goes out of business, the consumer is stuck with an EV with no battery.
    Unless you're a business looking for a tax benefit, leasing a battery has lots of negatives and few positives. If the only option for an EV is a leasted battery, count me out.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. The description of how sales are made, smacks of deception. If the consumer believes the vehicle is cheaper because the battery is not included, then either he is an idiot or has been mis-informed. I suggest the latter, as the intent seems to be to roll he battery lease into car payments without informing the purchaser, and hope he doesn't do the calculations to question why the payments are so high. This is marketing at its worst!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. Compare this to petrol - people don't see the upfront cost of the 10's of thousands a petrol car will chew through in it's lifetime.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Find Green Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.