According to a recent study conducted by the University of California, Berkeley, 64% of upcoming EV sales will include the vehicle and the battery as stand alone products that are in a sense purchased separately.
The study suggests that there is a direct correlation between immediate adoption of EV technology and separate battery ownership.
Initially, consumers may be fearful of purchasing a $15,000 battery. They may be inclined to believe that the technology is not proven, that the battery will suffer from durability or longevitiy issues, or that the vehicle they purchased will not suit their needs latter on and therefore are reluctant to purchase the battery as part of the vehicle costs.
Automakers have taken note of this study and many are following suit. Nissan is undecided if the battery will be included in the purchase price of the LEAF, allowing for the possibility of leasing it as a stand alone product. Other automakers have already decided to lease the battery separately.
Additionally, by not charging for the battery up front, the vehicle purchase price appears to drop significantly. Consumers don't see the massive battery cost rolled into the price of the vehicle and therefore assume the vehicle is cheaper to purchase. By not seeing an additional $15,000 in upfront costs, many buyers nearly forget about the price as it is rolled into a monthly lease payment.
The study suggests that as more consumers and early adopters report on the success of the battery technology, buyers will be more willing to pay for batteries upfront. The study suggests that by keeping the battery as a stand alone option, buyers will see a price tag that is much more competitive with an internal combustion engine.
As time progresses and the battery technology is proven, many buyers will want ownership of the batteries possibly for uses after it has served duty in the vehicle. At this time, automakers will likely switch over to include the battery as part of the vehicle price
Source: Wards Auto (Login required)
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
By Jason M. Hendler Posted: 9/4/2009 5:11am PDT
By TomEV Posted: 9/4/2009 6:13am PDT
Initially when the battery costs are high it would definitely be more attractive to lease the battery then once battery costs go down car companies can sell them together. (Source: http://www.zerauto.nl/blog/index.php/2009/03/23/think_city_nederland-elektrische_auto)
By Chris O Posted: 9/4/2009 11:18am PDT
By Noel Park Posted: 9/4/2009 12:36pm PDT
No transparency = no sale!
By evnow Posted: 9/5/2009 9:50am PDT
http://cet.berkeley.edu/news/uc-berkeley-study-finds-separate-battery-ownership-accelerates-mass-market-adoption-of-electric-cars
By swimdad623 Posted: 9/7/2009 3:11pm PDT
Once you buy an EV with a leased battery, you're locked into the battery lease contract. The contract would likely be written so that, if the technology improves, the leasor would see the benefit - not the consumer. Since the consumer has no benefit in caring for the battery, the running battery cost has to be higher to compensate for the abuse. And finally, if the leasing company goes out of business, the consumer is stuck with an EV with no battery.
Unless you're a business looking for a tax benefit, leasing a battery has lots of negatives and few positives. If the only option for an EV is a leasted battery, count me out.
By Roy Posted: 9/7/2009 9:59pm PDT
By Sam Sabey Posted: 9/8/2009 8:49pm PDT
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!