CARS, Cash For Clunkers Receives $2 Billion in Additional Funds

 

The CARS program's tremendous success depleted funds in just days.  Yesterday we reported that the program had been suspended due to lack of funds.  Well all of that has changed today as the U.S. House gathered for an emergency vote to put an additional $2 billion into the program.

The unexpected demand for the program created a budget shortfall.  Initially, the program was intended to run through November or until funds were depleted, nobody expected this to last just days after the programs official guidelines were released.

With House approval of additional funding, all that is needed is a Senate vote on the bill which is expected next week.  President Obama said he was "very pleased with the progress the House and made" and noted that the administration is "working with Congress to ensure the program can continue."

The vote in the House can in with a strong favor for adding additional money to the program at 316 votes for and 109 votes against.  The additional funds will come from a Department of Energy fund which was intended to be used for loans to energy projects, but was not to be distributed until next year.

According to the White House press secretary, the CARS program will continue on with no interruptions and they await likely approval of the bill by the Senate.  The press secretary Gibbs said, "If you were planning on going to buy a car this weekend, using this program, this program continues to run.  If you meet the requirements of the program, the certificates will be honored."

The CARS program has launched auto sales at many dealerships to some of the highest levels they have seen in years.  According to some analysts, auto sales in July and August could top all other months this year, signaling a rise in this slumping sector.

Though the Senate is expected to pass the bill for additional funding, there are sources that suggest the Senate may push for more efficient cars to be purchased under the program.  Many Senators have suggested that they would like to see cars purchased with much better fuel economy required by the program.  It would be a big lift to the hybrid market if they did increase the required mpgs of new vehicles purchased under the program.

We will update you again after the Senate vote is in, but for now the program will continue on as is and the clunkers will still be pouring in.

Source:  Bloomberg





Posted in:
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (4)
  1. I'm really disappointed in this bill. Why aren't cars older than 25 years eligable? Also, why require that the dealers destroy the engines? The government is essentially buying a few hundred thousand running vehicles and destroying them while we have hundreds of thousands of citizens that are unemployed or underemployed simply because they can't find a job that will fit within the confines of our extremely poor public transit system.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. What's the real goal of the program? Is it to reduce greenhouse gases and our dependence on foreign oil? Then why not mandate people buy hybrids or at least the top 10 or 20 most efficient cars (by MPG rating)?
    And if a $4,500 subsidy is good, then wouldn't a $9,000 subsidy be better? Heck, why not just give every voter a new car?!
    We have reached the Oprah Winfrey school of governing - win friends by giving away (or subsidizing) cars.
    - Aaron Dalton, Editor, http://1GreenProduct.com
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. I'm not at all surprised this initially lasted a week before something happened. What's that? Free money? Sign me up, people quickly rush to believe. What I find interesting is that this money is already OURS (read: TAXES). The fact that the government makes an emergency vote, on the final day before the recess mind you, to pump another billion dollars into this without much thought makes me reconsider future schemes. What's next?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. Also, aren't we in this recession partly because people lived beyond their means buying stuff that they couldn't afford anyway? So, buying a new car under the illusion that you're saving somewhere between $3,500-8,000, let's say (CARS rebate and dealer promos). That new car is likely to lose that value as soon as it's driven off the lot. Those people still HAVE to pay off those car payments and insurance monthly, if they can't afford other bills, there's no way they could do that. Too fishy.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Find Green Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.