EEStor Founder Dick Weir Confirms ESUs Presently Being Built, and Once Delivered to ZENN by the Fourth Quarter,

 


EEStor Inc is a Texas based startup that has been working in stealth mode for years to develop a disruptive breakthrough battery technology which would be extremely useful in electric cars.  The material they use is called Barium Titanate (composition modified) and has already been demonstrated to have extremely high permittivity, which means is can hold tremendous amounts of energy. Batteries made from this material would be several times lighter and less expensive than lithium-ion batteries, will not degrade over charge-discharge cycles, and could be recharged in minutes.

We recently heard from the CEO of ZENN Motors (ZNN.V) who is seeking to commercialize the ESU batteries for automotive use that the batteries were about to be publicly demonstrated for the first time, with proof they can hold energy at high voltage by September. ZENN is a 10 percent owner of EEStor, Inc.

An extensive audio interview with the normally silent Dick Weir, founder of EEStor, has been leaked to the web.  The 38 minute interview with an unknown interviewer took place in last month, and his identity has been confirmed by anonymous sources.

This is the first time in history we are give such extensive public details of the inner workings and validity of what EEStor is doing.

Weir explains that barium titanate has long been known to have high energy storage capacity but that previous workers had failed to successfully harness that property because of ineffective chemical engineering.  He explains how EEStor realized a milling process wouldn't work and how they invented a specialized aqueous process.

"We've done a great job because a lot of this stuff has been out here over 3 years, 3 1/2 years, and no degradation whatsoever," he says. "I mean zero. So we're very happy that we really have superior chemistry here and from the aqueous process."

He explains how high purification is extremely important to remove sodium and potassium which has resistance and block the chemical ability to operate at high voltage. He also noted the importance of coating the powder with aluminum oxide which they've done and "sealed in all the goodness," preventing particles from talking to one another. He confirmed the material has been certified as pure. Finally he notes that through other processes EEStor was able to achieve a high permittivity operating in the deep ferroelectric phase. As Weir puts it "we knew we'd hit the home run then," and "the permittivity was 22,500 and or higher." He noted their goal was 18,500 and that their tests "shows 22,500 and greater...we're just not going to tell how great it is."

He mentioned they've passed all their milestones and have put ZENN's recent $700,000 payment "to very good use."

"We're actually installing our stuff now to go into ESU production," he said. "And we've told the world that you can anticipate us being in a proto in a pre-production mode of ESUs by the 4'th quarter this year."

He notes since it is now June (at the time of the recording), "I'm ahead of schedule."

He says the ramp up of production is modular and inexpensive. He says "you get the hardware quick enough to actually ramp up and put your lines in at a very effective time frame." And he notes it doesn't cost $5 million for a piece of assembly equipment but rather "it's more in the neighborhood of something $50,000 and I can buy it off the shelf...Very cost effective and time effective."

He explains how the basic ingredient Barite is very readily available, much more so than lithium. He says that Barite used to be used in cathode ray TVs which are now a thing of the past so therefore his company is "the best friend the Barium company's got in the world."






Posted in:
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Comments (23)
  1. These are exciting times - I can't wait for the retail product ... hopefully, by the time (2 or 3 more years) I need new batteries for my home power (solar/wind) EEStor will have something ready for me, and later this year I'll be looking for PHEV!!!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Of course, there remains the giant possibility that EEStor is some sort of scam or delusion. Nobody has yet been quoted as even seeing a working prototype of the EESU. The science doesn't appear to be credible and EEStor's actions over the years have been very odd. It may be another Blacklight Power type deal that drags on for a decade or two.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. Indigo, the science is very credible. Please read up at www.theeestory.com for more info.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. Factual errors - sodium and potassium eliminated because they conduct, not have "resistance".
    Also, deep into the paraelectric phase, not "ferroelectric"
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. Note that it was copied wrong from the actual Interview.
    Original interview was transcribed here: http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2299558/posts
    Does anybody have the audio/video source of the interview?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. Indigo, I'd agree with you if they weren't settings these dates/time frames. I know they set dates before, but i think they were overly excited about their product. With that under their belt (and a couple years) if they did it again, whether they had a real product or not, they would be sunk. This is their last chance. If by 1st quarter next year there still isn't anything, i would think all their funding would be pulled. Or they would be forced to go public with whatever they had.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. I can see the need for secrecy, if its this disruptive and another company with more resources beats you to the punch you loose everything.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. Indigo,
    ZENN has seen the working technology up close. Moreover, Lockeed Martin is working closely with EEStor from the defense industry angle, and you can be certain GM has peeked into the labs. At this point, it's highly doubtful that the science underlying the technology is a scam, rather it's simply going to come down to their execution at fielding reliable, production EEStors.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. I'm very excited about this. My goal is to have my home EV conversion ready by earth day of next year. Hopefully, they'll be to market by then!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  10. Jay- I believe the Lockheed connection is oversold. Yes they have ties but all they have is a small contract with them now. A larger contract may come contingent on delivery.
    Dick Weir sounds very confident in the entire interview except when explaining the science. If they are so close to delivery why did Topfer just leave the board? The scam/delusion theory is still very much alive.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  11. It's the potential that's so exciting. We have all been waiting for the next giant leap in battery technology, and this may well be it! If these guys can just prove the potential we will be well on our way. My congratulations on the progress to date.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  12. I just had an orgasm!
    I've been following EEStor for years, skeptical, yet hopeful.
    There is a God!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  13. So what we have...a bootleg interview that may or may not be with Dick Weir, that tells every EV enthusiast exactly what he wants to hear and will probably boost EEStor/Zenn's stock value in the process. Hmm, should ring an alarm bell or two...
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  14. EESTOR/Zenn cannot even get their lies straight. In 2007 according to Dick Weir EESTOR's first production line was complete. In the June 2009 DW interview, Dick claims the production line is 85% complete. EESTor went backwards on the production line.
    Original audio interview available @
    http://www.4all.com/uploads/DW_Confcall_jun2009.mp3
    (18 meg) best way to download, right click select “Save As”.
    THANK YOU Smackyyz!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  15. Last years comments on completion of the assembly line were in reference to the chemical purification and uniformity of powder production process line. This is totaly different from the EESU production line currently being built.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  16. Arizona, Get your facts straight.
    http://gm-volt.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2999
    According to Dick Weir the first EESTOR production line was built in 2007...from Ian Clifford's mouth he stated on a youtube video EESTOR to deliver EESU's to Zenn end of 07. How the hell was EESTOR going to deliver EESU's to Zenn if the line was not completed, unless you believe Ian Clifford was LYING. And let's not forget Ian Clifford in 08 stated delivery is "imminent".
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  17. When something is too good to be true, it probably is.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  18. A company in California? Can you say Lockheed?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  19. Even if EESTOR doesn't deliver exactly what was first claimed and instead delivers 50 or 60% of what was claimed, it'll still be a big step in the right direction. This type of electrical storage device is what we need to explore. It has so many advantages over battery chemistry and much simpler and cleaner. Break a leg EESTOR, we need this technology.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  20. My guess is there was some kind of problem that had to be fixed over the last couple of years, maybe the fuse system or something like that. That pops into my mind because I read somewhere that a number of prototypes were destroyed in safey testing. This is just a guess and not based on any verified info.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  21. If Mr. Weir's statements are true, then why would EEStor not choose to simply demonstrate a single unit publically? This would appear to be in his best interests, by eliminating doubts and confidence in his technology. Instead, we still get the impression of overpromising and underdelivering, and EEStor's product remains vaporware.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  22. What would the benefit to EEStor be for a public demostration of their technology, other then placing them under an even bigger magnifing lens. It seems they have already demostrated it to the investors that matter and have recieved all the funding they need.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  23. Weir still waiting for the reveal. Don't worry be happy, it's only the 14th month of 2009.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Find Green Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback.
 

Use the form below to send us a tip, give us feedback, or just say hello.

(max 750 characters)