House Bill Cash For Clunkers Meets Resistance From Senate; Bill May Be Dead on Arrival

 

Clunkers

Clunkers

The Cash For Clunkers program presented by the House of Representatives a few weeks back has hit a brick wall as the Senate decides to offer up what they say is a better plan. 

The program which we talked about here, Cash for Clunkers Approved by House, has been widely praised by many as a way to get old cars off the streets and exchange them with newer, fuel efficient vehicles.  However, a few key Senators have their own take on the program and will likely uphold it for a long time.

Sen. Feinstein (DEM) and Sen. Susan Collins (REP) have combined with other to propose a counter bill.  Their program only differs slightly from the House version, but just enough to put the bill on hold for now.

The Senate version of the bill would give customers cash vouchers for the purchase of a new vehicle when they trade in their old one.  Additionally, the new version would give even more money to those that trade in their clunkers, up to $4,500 in some instances.  There is even a provision to give incentives for trading to newer heavy duty work trucks that carry no EPA fuel mileage rating.

According to Sen. Collins, "Federal support for purchasing new cars must also promote greater fuel efficiency as a way to reduce our dependence on foreign oil.  The House agreement announced weeks ago does not achieve that goal.  Our alternative proposal, which would save up to 38 percent more oil than the House agreement, offers both economic and environmental benefits."

Clearly a battle is brewing between the House and the Senate and those in desperate need of replacing their clunkers will have to wait.  The counter bill will be presented to the House, who will likely deny the bill and offer their own compromised version.  Eventually both sides may reach an agreement, but for now the consumers are the ones that lose out.

Source:  Edmunds





Posted in:
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (4)
  1. Isn't this a little pre-mature. In the coming years i would expect tech to get even better. Have you seen the 150 mpg suv http://www.afstrinity.com/ ? I have read their site and it seems logical. If they can do it then gm can slightly modify the volt or Toyota and the prius, in any case if we do this now there will surely be a small gain in overall mpg for USA, but if they wait a year or two the mpg could be better
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. The AFS Trinity 150 mpg is really a stretch. They fail to mention that to achieve those numbers, they stop every 30 to 40 miles and plug-in the vehicle for awhile so they can drive all electric again and thus save fuel. The vehicle returns nowhere near that amount in regular driving. Maybe 40 to 50 mpg.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. This bill would put every charity car donation program in the nation out of business since the amount of the voucher would be much greater than the tax deduction. The solution is to simply allow the charity to issue the voucher in lieu of the tax deduction. The charity would then junk the car in accordance with the bill. This way, everyone wins, the car dealer, car maker, car buyer and the charity.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. seeing that the cash for clunkers gave a boost for autosales but sales went right back down after the money ran out, what do you think are effective ways to save the auto industry?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Find Green Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.